Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;52(2):134–142. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2018.01.001

Table 3.

Tendon graft lengths of FHL and FDL with different incision techniques and the distance between certain landmarks and variables.

Techniques N Distance from point to landmarks mean of the length ± SD (range)a
Plantar approach 20 The mean of Foot Length 23.23 ± 1.30 (21.50–26.50)
20 Back of heel to FDLd 11.04 ± 0.95 (10.01–13.37)
20 Base of second toe to FDLd 8.46 ± 0.58 (7.08–9.37)
20 FDLd to lateral border of foot 3.38 ± 0.30 (2.43–3.80)
20 FDLd to medial border of foot 3.31 ± 0.29 (2.78–3.97)
20 FDL tendon graft length 9.37 ± 0.77 (8.08–10.69)
20 FDL tendon to tip of medial malleolus 2.92 ± 0.24 (2.42–3.39)
Medial approach 20 Length of the incision line 8.65 ± 0.63 (7.75–9.84)
20 FDL tendon graft length 6.14 ± 0.60 (4.61–7.08)
Single incision technique 20 FHL musculotendinous junction to ST 5.75 ± 0.63 (4.52–6.86)
Double incision technique 20 FHL musculotendinous junction to MKH 7.03 ± 0.86 (5.77–8.8)
Minimal invasive technique 20 FHL musculotendinous junction to IP 20.22 ± 1.32 (16.82–21.97)

ST: Sustentaculum tali, IP: first interphalangeal joint.

a

cm.