Table 2.

Type of participants and their social networks, motivations to participate and intervention outcomes.

	Network size	Motivation to participate	Found as a result of the intervention	Not found as a result of the intervention
Lonely participants (n=8)	Between 0 and 3 persons who visit regularly [mainly family: strong ties]	Finding lasting friendships [strong ties]	Temporary warm ties, temporary diversion from dense of loneliness	Lasting friendships [strong ties]
	4 respondents performed [unpaid] work [weak ties]	Overcoming loneliness and general lack of wellbeing		Overcoming loneliness and general lack of wellbeing
Activist participants (n=4)	Between 3 and 7 persons who visit regularly [family, partner or friend: strong ties]	Meeting other social groups and fighting the stigma of their own group through this [bridging capital]	Finding likeminded people to discuss views on care	Meeting other social groups and fighting the stigma of their own group through this [bridging capital]
	Active in client platforms/interest groups [strong and weak ties]	Finding a functional role co-determining the intervention [linking capital]		Finding a functional role co-determining the intervention [linking capital]
	All respondents performed [unpaid] work [weak ties]
Satisfied participants (n=7)	Between 5 and 15 persons who visit regularly [family, partner or friend: strong ties]	Conviviality and good food	Conviviality and good food	-
	5 respondents performed [unpaid] work [weak ties]	Meeting new people and enjoying being around them [weak ties]	Meeting new people and enjoying being around them [weak ties]	-
Calculating participant	?	Low-priced food?	Low-priced food	?