Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 1;3(1):16. doi: 10.3390/tropicalmed3010016

Table 4.

Dog ownership and attitude towards biting incidents.

Parameter Pre-Implementation
N = 1088 (%)
Post-Implementation
N = 1380 (%)
p-Value
Number of dogs owned
1–2 868 (79.8) 1134 (82.2) 0.1304
3–4 183 (16.8) 205 (14.9) 1.8021
5 and above 37 (3.4) 41 (2.9) 1.5192
Vaccination History (N = 2193, N = 2421)
2015 1272 (58.0) 890 (36.8) 2.0000
2016 1300 (54.0)
2017 890 (36.8)
Biting Incidence
Yes 225 (20.7) 292 (21.2) 0.7618
No 863 (79.3) 1088 (78.8) 1.2382
Owner of biting dog
Owner’s dog itself 116 (51.6) 102 (35.0) 1.9999
Stray with owner 77 (34.2) 117 (40.1) 0.1544
Stray without owner 50 (22.2) 72 (18.5) 1.6944
Others 5 (2.2) 1 (0.4) 1.9533
First aid adopted
Washed with soap 186 (82.7) 150 (51.4) 2.0000
Applied with garlic 38 (16.9) 24 (8.2) 2.0000
Visited ‘tandok‘ 64 (28.6) 63 (21.6) 1.9957
Did nothing 24 (10.5) 12 (4.1) 2.0000
Consulted Animal Bite Treatment Center 116 (51.6) 113 (38.7) 2.0000
Others 20 (8.9) 38 (13.9) 0.0040
Action done to the biting dog (N = 225, N = 292)
Observed 58 (25.8) 95 (32.5) 0.0980
Killed instantly 20 (8.9) 34 (11.6) 0.3196
Killed and head brought to laboratory 1 (0.4) 3 (1.0) 0.4401
Did nothing 139 (61.8) 154 (52.7) 1.9616
Others 7 (3.11) 6 (2.0) 1.5758