Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 18;7(8):e1452582. doi: 10.1080/2162402X.2018.1452582

Table 3.

Comparison of diagnostic power of the prediction model with 6TAAs for different stage of GC.

  Training cohort
Validation cohort
Stage N Positive (%) P N Positive (%) P
Early-stage(I-II) 98 66 (67.34) 0.680 73 55 (75.34) 0.560
Late-stage (III-IV) 110 77 (70.00)   82 65 (78.31)  

6 TAAs: p62,c-Myc, NPM1, 14-3-3ξ, MDM2 and p16.