Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 6;67(7):1035–1044. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy252

Table 1.

Extent of Within-country Clustering by Ribotype

Ribotype Isolates, No. Isolates Sequenced, No. (%) Countries Where Ribotype Was Found, No. SNPs Between Isolates, Overall Median (IQR) TMRCA (95% HPD) SNPacross Median (IQR) SNPwithin Median (IQR) SNPwithin/SNPacross Ratio Expected Ratio, 95% CIb Compatible With Random European Distribution Distance Between Hospitals for Most Closely Related Isolates, Median (IQR), Milesa
020 37 33 (89) 9 43 (34–64) 1955 (1920–1986) 52 (34–104) 42 (34–60) 1.25 .84–1.24 Yes 542 (256–796)
014 86 80 (93) 13 146 (66–172) 1963 (1924–1995) 147 (59–173) 146 (68–171) 1.01 .87–1.09 Yes 347 (198–608)
002 48 44 (92) 11 73 (61–97) 1955 (1922–1986) 69 (59–88) 75 (62–100) 0.92 .88–1.05 Yes 443 (191–817)
015 30 29 (97) 7 298 (54–366) 1857 (1757–1943) 296 (29–364) 346 (189–433) 0.86 .84–1.18 Yes 280 (176–574)
078 37 31 (84) 9 54 (34–148) 1721 (1556–1872) 56 (29–129) 54 (35–152) 1.04 .74–1.43 Yes 424 (266–812)
027 223 216 (97) 10 71 (50–110) 1949 (1913–1977) 49 (17–71) 82 (60–125) 0.60 .93–1.07 No 21 (0–189)
001/072 134 119 (89) 14 201 (41–273) 1851 (1754–1934) 37 (23–199) 253 (173–322) 0.15 .70–1.31 No 184 (0–351)
176 25 21 (84) 3 15 (7–19) 1993 (1977–2004) 6 (4–8) 19 (16–20) 0.31 .65–1.23 No 36 (0–198)
018 36 34 (94) 7 39 (22–88) 1787 (1638–1910) 28 (17–38) 92 (83–285) 0.30 .40–1.56 No 189 (53–636)
356 22 17 (77) 1 9 (5–12) 2008 (2004–2011) 9 (5–12) No 133 (57–248)

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; HPD, highest posterior density interval; IQR, interquartile range, SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; SNPacross, SNPs between isolates across different countries; SNPwithin, SNPs between isolates within a country; TMRCA, time of most recent common ancestor.

aTo calculate the number of miles between the most closely related isolates, within each ribotype, a minimum spanning tree was constructed using SNP distances as edge weights and isolates as nodes. The properties of the edges (SNPs and miles) of the minimum-spanning tree were analyzed, such that each isolate but 1 contributes 1 data point (see Figure 5).

bCIs were based on permutation tests (see Methods).