Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 30;40(4):158–164. doi: 10.1016/j.pld.2018.06.005

Table 1.

Comparison of the four commonly used genome-partitioning approaches.

Genome skimming RNA-seq RAD-seq Hyb-seq
Demand for plant materials Fresh, silica-gel dried plant tissues and specimen Fresh plant tissues Fresh, silica-gel dried plant tissues Fresh, silica-gel dried plant tissues and specimen
Demand for DNA template quality Low High Medium Low
Applicable to specimen Yes No No Yes
Material for sequencing Total genomic DNA cDNA Restriction fragments Captured loci using probes
Genome data obtained Complete plastid genome, nrDNA, partial mitochondrial genome, coding and non-coding genes Randomly sequenced loci of vast majority of nuclear genome; coding genes Loci with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) mainly from nuclear genome; coding and non-coding genes Targeted nuclear, plastid and/or mitochondrial loci; coding and non-coding genes
Targeted loci sequenced Yes No No Yes
Identification of orthologs Easy Relatively easy Difficult Easy
Missing data among species No Yes Yes No
Taxonomic levels for phylogenetic relationships All levels from shallow to deep Deep levels, above intra-generic Shallow levels, below inter-generic All levels from shallow to deep, above intraspecific