Table 3.

Full and Trimmed Model Parameters

	Model 1	Model 2	Model 2	Model 3	Model 3	Model 4	Model 4
		(full)	(trimmed)	(full)	(trimmed)	(full)	(trimmed)
Within-person fixed effects
Intercept	2.17***	1.90***	2.21***	1.83***	2.25***	1.89***	2.25***
ADS (today), β01	0.05	0.06	0.07	0.06
Care subjective stress, β01		0.01***	0.01***	0.01**	0.01***
Noncare subjective stress, β02		0.02	0.02	0.04***	0.04***
Positive effecta				−0.05		−0.35***	−0.35***
Negative effect, β05					0.07
ADS × Care subjective stress, β04		0.00
ADS × Noncare subjective stress, β05		0.04*	0.04*
Positive affect × Care subjective stress, β06				0.01
Positive affect × Noncare subjective stress, β07				0.00
Negative affect × Care subjective stress, β08				0.01
Negative affect × Noncare subjective stress, β09				−0.04
ADS (yesterday), β01						−0.06	−0.05
ADS (yesterday)*Positive affect, β 03						0.33**	0.33**
Between-person fixed effects
Caregiver age, β10	−0.01	0.00		0.00		−0.01
Caregiver gender, β20	−0.26	−0.29		−0.35		−0.10
Duration of care, β30	0.00	0.00		0.00		0.00
IWD ADL impairment, β40	0.12	0.07		0.08		0.11
OTC medication use, β50	0.09	0.09		0.07		0.11
Caregiver pain frequency, β60	0.35***	0.29***	0.31***	0.30***	0.38***	0.34***	0.35***
Caregiver pain interference, β70	0.22**	0.14**	0.17**	0.10		0.18**	0.17
Extent of ADS use, β80	0.03			0.09		0.09
Care subjective stress, β90		0.01		0.01
Noncare subjective stress, β100		0.08**	0.10**	0.05
Positive affect, β110				−0.11
Negative affect, β120				0.38
Random effects
σ2	0.56***	0.53***	0.53***	0.53***	0.54***	0.50***	0.50***
τ00	0.72***	0.66***	0.68***	0.64***	0.77***	0.77***	0.78***
BIC	3289.88	3114.39	3078.48	3130.69	3082.86	2683.88	2665.16

^aPositive affect was estimated by β₀₄ in Model 3 and β₀₂ in Model 4.

**p < .01. ***p < .001.