Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 13;120(5):484–490. doi: 10.1017/S0007114518001617

Table 1.

Metabolites shown to be significantly different in abundance between placebo diet and medium-chanin TAG diet (MCTD) phases*

Metabolite names Molecular formula M v. P (P) FDR (M v. P) (P) LC protocol (ESI mode) Adduct (detected) Mass m/z (detected) Mass m/z (theoretical) Δppm Fold change CV (%)
Metabolites higher in abundance during the placebo diet phase
Acylcarnitine (16 : 0) C23H45NO4 <0·001 <0·001 LP (+) [Met+H] 400·3432 400·3421 3 1·62 17
Acylcarnitine (18 : 1) C25H47NO4 <0·001 0·005 LP (+) [Met+H] 426·3585 426·3578 2 1·68 14
Acylcarnitine (18 : 0) C25H49NO4 <0·001 0·005 LP (+) [Met+H] 428·3736 428·3734 0 1·43 8
LysoPC (18 : 3) C26H48NO7P 0·002 0·02 LP (+) [Met+H] 518·3243 518·3241 0 1·20 19
LysoPC (18 : 2) C26H50NO7P <0·001 0·005 LP (+) [Met+H] 520·3406 520·3393 2 1·22 20
PC (16 : 0/18 : 2) C42H80NO8P <0·001 <0·001 LP (+) [Met+H] 758·5724 758·5694 4 1·24 13
PC (16 : 0/18 : 1) C42H82NO8P <0·001 0·003 RP (−) [Met+FA-H] 804·5747 804·5760 2 1·14 2
PC (18 : 0/18 : 2) C44H84NO8P <0·001 0·012 RP (−) [Met+FA-H] 830·5904 830·5917 2 1·18 3
Metabolites higher in abundance during the MCTD phase
LysoPC (17 : 0) C25H52NO7P <0·001 0·013 RP (−) [Met+FA-H] 554·3457 554·3463 1 1·33 4
LysoPC (20 : 1) C28H56NO7P <0·001 0·006 LP (+) [Met+H] 550·3893 550·3867 5 1·43 17
LysoPC (22 : 5) C30H52NO7P <0·001 0·012 RP (−) [Met+FA-H] 614·3457 614·3462 1 2·62 6
PC (17 : 0/20 : 4) C45H82NO8P 0·002 0·032 RP (−) [Met+FA-H] 840·5754 840·5760 1 1·39 2
PC (18 : 0/20 : 5) C46H82NO8P <0·001 <0·001 LP (+) [Met+H] 808·5895 808·5851 5 1·44 11
PC (18 : 0/20 : 4) C46H84NO8P <0·001 0·019 RP (−) [Met+FA-H] 854·5901 854·5917 2 1·13 3
PC (18 : 0/22 : 6) C48H84NO8P <0·001 <0·001 LP (+) [Met+H] 834·6078 834·6007 8 2·15 14
PC (18 : 0/22 : 5) C48H86NO8P <0·001 <0·001 LP (+) [Met+H] 836·6215 836·6164 6 1·90 16

FDR, false discover rate; M, MCTD phase; P, placebo diet phase; ESI, electrospray ionisation; m/z, mass:charge ratio; Δppm, deviation between measured mass and theoretical mass in ppm calculated; CV (%), CV calculated based on total number of pooled quality control samples acquired during experimental run; P value correction; LP, lipid profiling; Met, metabolite; PC, phosphocholine; RP, reversed phase; FA, formate; UPLC–MS, ultra-performance liquid chromatography-MS.

*Metabolites were detected in ESI+ and ESI− modes using LP-UPLC-MS and RP-UPLC-MS (percentages). Significant metabolites were determined using paired Student’s t test with FDR P value correction (P < 0·05) and identified in UPLC–MS/MS experiments, respectively.