Skip to main content
. 2018 May 30;153(7):e181167. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2018.1167

Table 3. Loop Inconsistency and Heterogeneity.

Outcome of Interest No. of Studies No. of Patients Inconsistency P Valueb Heterogeneity, τ
Loopa IF or RoR (95% CI)
Success rate 20 2490 A-C-D 1.30 (1.00-5.70) .73 0.8
Overall morbidity 19 2403 A-C-D 1.61 (1.00-3.78) .27 0.2
Overall mortality 19 2403 A-C-D 1.21 (1.00-25.34) .90 <0.1
Acute Pancreatitis 19 2403 A-C-D 4.23 (1.00-24.43) .11 <0.1
Biliary leak 18 2320 A-C-D 1.91 (1.00-17.85) .57 <0.1
Overall bleeding 18 2320 A-C-D 4.63 (1.00-36.67) .15 <0.1
Overall operative time 8 1142 A-C-D 19.05 (2.44-35.65) .02 >1
LOS 14 1818 A-C-D 1.76 (0.00-4.28) .64 >1
Total costs 4 521 A-C-D 17.06 (3.56-107.21) .04 >1

Abbreviations: IF, absolute difference between direct and indirect estimates; LOS, length of postoperative hospital stay; RoR, logarithm of the ratio of 2 odds ratios.

a

A indicates laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus laparoscopic common bile duct exploration; C, preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography plus laparoscopic cholecystectomy; and D, laparoscopic cholecystectomy plus intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

b

P values were calculated with the χ2 test.