Table 1.
Outcome | Impact Effect (95% CI) | No. of Participants (RCTs) | Quality of the Evidence (GRADE) |
---|---|---|---|
Change in maximal inspiratory pressure from baseline after IMT | Mean difference in change 6 (5 to 8) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group | 647 (15 RCTs) | ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,†,‡ |
Pooled ratio of means for change in MIP relative to baseline MIP, 1.21 (1.16 to 1.26) | |||
Change in maximal inspiratory pressure from baseline after IMT (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) | Mean difference 9 (7 to 12) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group | 175 (3 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High |
Maximal inspiratory pressure after IMT | Mean difference 7 (6 to 8) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group | 575 (15 RCTs) | ⊕⊕◯◯ Low*,‡ |
Change in maximal expiratory pressure from baseline after IMT | Mean difference in change 9 (5 to 14) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group | 153 (4 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕◯ Moderate* |
Pooled ratio of means for change in MEP relative to baseline MEP, 1.39 (1.27 to 1.54) | |||
Change in maximal expiratory pressure from baseline after IMT (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) | Mean difference in change 9 (5 to 14) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group | 106 (2 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High |
Duration of ventilation | Pooled duration of ventilation was 4.1 (0.8 to 7.4) d shorter in IMT group than in control group | 325 (9 RCTs) | ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,†,‡,§ |
Duration of ventilation (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) | Pooled duration of ventilation was 4.6 (−1.0 to 10.1) d shorter in IMT group than in control group | 220 (4 RCTs) | ⊕⊕◯◯ Low†,§ |
Duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation | Pooled duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation was 2.3 (0.7 to 3.9) d shorter in IMT group than in control group | 257 (8 RCTs) | ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,†,§ |
Duration of weaning (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) | Pooled duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation was 3.2 (0.6 to 5.8) d shorter in IMT group than in control group | 209 (5 RCTs) | ⊕⊕◯◯ Low†,§ |
ICU length of stay | Length of stay in ICU was 3.1 (−1.0 to 7.1) d shorter in IMT group than in control group | 28 (2 RCTs) | ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,‡,§ |
Mortality in ICU | Pooled relative risk of death in ICU was 0.67 (0.20 to 2.20) in IMT group compared with control group | 197 (3 RCTs) | ⊕⊕◯◯ Low‡,§ |
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence | |||
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect. | |||
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different. | |||
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect. | |||
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect. |
Definition of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; ICU = intensive care unit; IMT = inspiratory muscle training; MEP = maximal expiratory pressure; MIP = maximal inspiratory pressure; RCT = randomized controlled trial.
Multiple studies were at high risk of bias.
Inconsistency: statistical heterogeneity was substantial (I2 > 75% and P < 0.05), and confidence intervals show no or minimal overlap.
Studies employed cointerventions.
Imprecision: confidence intervals did not exclude statistically significant benefit or harm.