Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun;15(6):735–744. doi: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201712-961OC

Table 1.

GRADE summary of findings for the impact of inspiratory muscle training in critically ill patients

Outcome Impact Effect (95% CI) No. of Participants (RCTs) Quality of the Evidence (GRADE)
Change in maximal inspiratory pressure from baseline after IMT Mean difference in change 6 (5 to 8) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group 647 (15 RCTs) ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,,
Pooled ratio of means for change in MIP relative to baseline MIP, 1.21 (1.16 to 1.26)
Change in maximal inspiratory pressure from baseline after IMT (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) Mean difference 9 (7 to 12) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group 175 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
Maximal inspiratory pressure after IMT Mean difference 7 (6 to 8) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group 575 (15 RCTs) ⊕⊕◯◯ Low*,
Change in maximal expiratory pressure from baseline after IMT Mean difference in change 9 (5 to 14) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group 153 (4 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕◯ Moderate*
Pooled ratio of means for change in MEP relative to baseline MEP, 1.39 (1.27 to 1.54)
Change in maximal expiratory pressure from baseline after IMT (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) Mean difference in change 9 (5 to 14) cm H2O higher in IMT group than in control group 106 (2 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊕⊕ High
Duration of ventilation Pooled duration of ventilation was 4.1 (0.8 to 7.4) d shorter in IMT group than in control group 325 (9 RCTs) ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,,,§
Duration of ventilation (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) Pooled duration of ventilation was 4.6 (−1.0 to 10.1) d shorter in IMT group than in control group 220 (4 RCTs) ⊕⊕◯◯ Low,§
Duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation Pooled duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation was 2.3 (0.7 to 3.9) d shorter in IMT group than in control group 257 (8 RCTs) ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,,§
Duration of weaning (sensitivity analysis excluding studies at high risk of bias) Pooled duration of weaning from mechanical ventilation was 3.2 (0.6 to 5.8) d shorter in IMT group than in control group 209 (5 RCTs) ⊕⊕◯◯ Low,§
ICU length of stay Length of stay in ICU was 3.1 (−1.0 to 7.1) d shorter in IMT group than in control group 28 (2 RCTs) ⊕◯◯◯ Very low*,,§
Mortality in ICU Pooled relative risk of death in ICU was 0.67 (0.20 to 2.20) in IMT group compared with control group 197 (3 RCTs) ⊕⊕◯◯ Low,§
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence
High quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect.
Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different.
Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited; the true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect.
Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate; the true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect.

Definition of abbreviations: CI = confidence interval; GRADE = Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation; ICU = intensive care unit; IMT = inspiratory muscle training; MEP = maximal expiratory pressure; MIP = maximal inspiratory pressure; RCT = randomized controlled trial.

*

Multiple studies were at high risk of bias.

Inconsistency: statistical heterogeneity was substantial (I2 > 75% and P < 0.05), and confidence intervals show no or minimal overlap.

Studies employed cointerventions.

§

Imprecision: confidence intervals did not exclude statistically significant benefit or harm.