Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 20;6:102–113. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2018.07.011

Table 1.

Optimization of Conditions for Visible-Light Photoredox Olefination

Inline graphic
Entry PC Base (equiv) Solvent Time (h) Yielda
1 A Cs2CO3 CH3CN 6 93
2 B Cs2CO3 CH3CN 6 21
3 C Cs2CO3 CH3CN 6 89
4 D Cs2CO3 CH3CN 6 67
5 A K2CO3 CH3CN 6 93
6 A NA2CO3 CH3CN 6 61
7b A CH3CN 6 11
8c A K2CO3 CH3CN 6 92
9d A K2CO3 CH3CN 6 80
10e A K2CO3 CH3CN 6 NR
11 A K2CO3 CH3CN 4 93
12 A K2CO3 CH3CN 3 88
13 A K2CO3 DMF 4 90
14 A K2CO3 DMA 4 74
15 A K2CO3 DMSO 4 43
16 A K2CO3 CH2Cl2 4 45
17f A K2CO3 CH3CN 4 84
18g A K2CO3 CH3CN 9 90
19h A K2CO3 CH3CN 4 Trace
20i K2CO3 CH3CN 4 Trace
21j A K2CO3 CH3CN 4 Trace

Reaction conditions: Ar atmosphere and irradiation of visible light with 23-W CFL, 4-bromobenzyl bromide (1a) (1.0 mmol), paraformaldehyde (2a) (2.0 mmol, relative to amount of formaldehyde), triphenylphosphine (PPh3) (1.5 mmol), photocatalyst (5.0 μmol), base (1.5 mmol), solvent (10 mL), temperature (room temperature ∼25 oC), time 3–6 hr, in a sealed Schlenk tube.

PC, photocatalyst; CFL, compact fluorescent light; DMA, N,N-dimethylacetamide; NR, no reaction.

a

Isolated yield.

b

No base.

c

In the presence of 2 equiv of PPh3.

d

In the presence of 1 equiv of PPh3.

e

No PPh3.

f

Using aqueous formaldehyde (2b) (37% aqueous solution) (2.0 mmol) instead of paraformaldehyde (2a).

g

Under irradiation of 5-W blue LED light for 9 hr.

h

The reaction was carried out in air.

i

No photocatalyst.

j

No light.