TABLE 1—

Comparison of Receipt of Primary Care Between Preexposure Prophylaxis (PrEP) Users and Individuals Not Prescribed PrEP: Fenway Health, Boston, MA, 2012–2016

Type of Primary Care Received	PrEP Users (n = 2047), No.	Non-PrEP Users (n = 3810), No.	Unadjusted PR = (95% CI)	Adjusted PR = (95% CI)
Influenza vaccination (yes vs no)	1109	1248	1.39 (1.31, 1.48)	1.28 (1.20, 1.37)
Tobacco screening (yes vs no)	1782	2570	1.15 (1.12, 1.19)	1.06 (1.02, 1.09)
Depression screening (yes vs no)	1847	2364	1.34 (1.30, 1.38)	1.07 (1.04, 1.11)
Hemoglobin A1c or glucose testing (yes vs no)	1603	1588	1.78 (1.70, 1.85)	1.64 (1.56, 1.72)
Hemoglobin A1c testing (yes vs no)	356	538	0.98 (0.87, 1.11)	0.81 (0.71, 0.93)
Glucose testing (yes vs no)	1570	1414	1.94 (1.85, 2.03)	1.78 (1.69, 1.88)

Note. CI = confidence interval; PR = prevalence ratio. Sample sizes represent individuals who ever used PrEP or each type of primary care during the study period. We obtained unadjusted and adjusted PRs from Poisson models with generalized estimating equations to account for clustering among patients tested for rectal sexually transmitted infections, and thus included in the data set, in multiple years. Adjusted models included age, gender, race/ethnicity, insurance type, year, and number of visits, with diabetes, hypertension, and overweight or obesity additionally included in models for hemoglobin A1c and glucose testing.