Table 2.
Comparison of number of exams with insufficient sweat weight (below 75 mg) between continuous constant current and sinusoidal and triangular continuous pulsed current
| Continuous constant current | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sweat weight | Sufficient | Insufficient | p-value | |
| Sinusoidal pulsed current | Sufficient | 49 (89.1%) | 3 (5.5%) | 0.655a |
| Insufficient | 2 (3.6%) | 1 (1.8%) | ||
| Triangular pulsed current | Sufficient | 172 (83.9%) | 9 (4.4%) | 0.523b |
| Insufficient | 13 (6.3%) | 11 (5.4%) | ||
| Continuous pulsed current | Sufficient | 221 (85%) | 12 (4.6%) | 0.333c |
| Insufficient | 15 (5.8%) | 12 (4.6%) | ||
Statistical analysis conducted through McNemar’s tests. Alpha = 0.05
aNumber of observed agreements = 50 (90.91%); Number of agreements expected by chance = 48.4 (88.07%); Kappa = 0.238; SE of kappa = 0.232; 95% confidence interval (95%CI) = − 0.217 to 0.693; strength of agreement = fair
bNumber of observed agreements = 183 (93.85%); number of agreements expected by chance = 163.9 (84.04%); Kappa = 0.614; SE of kappa = 0.101; 95%CI = 0.416 to 0.813; strength of agreement = good
cNumber of observed agreements = 233 (89.62%); number of agreements expected by chance = 214 (82.3%); Kappa = 0.413; SE of kappa = 0.093; 95%CI = 0.232 to 0.595; strength of agreement = moderate. As shown in the table, the minor prevalence of insufficient sweat weight occurred for sinusoidal pulsed current (1.8%)