Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 10;12:2857–2873. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S124380

Table 6.

Efficacy outcomes in terms of median overall survival (OS) in atezolizumab randomized trials, according to PD-L1 expression

Differential populations as for PD-L1 scoring OAK21 Poplar19 IMpower150 (WT population)a,24 IMpower131a,27
Atezo (months) Doc (months) HR P-value Atezo (months) Doc (months) HR P-value ABCP (months) BCP (months) HR P-value ACnP (months) CnP (months) HR P-value
ITT (n)
pts
13.3
613
9.8
612
0.80
0.0012
12.6
144
9.7
143
0.69
0.011
19.2
359
14.7
337
0.78
0.02
14.0
343
13.9
340
0.96b
0.6931
TC3 or IC3
pts
20.5
89 (14%)
9.7
85 (14%)
0.45
,0.0001
NR
24 (17%)
11.1
23 (16%)
0.45
0.033
25.2 15 0.70b 23.6
53 (15%)
14.1
48 (14%)
0.56
136 (20%)
TC2/3 or IC2/3
pts
16.6
168 (27%)
11.4
182 (30%)
0.64
0.0012
15.1
50 (35%)
7.4
55 (38%)
0.50
0.003
NA NA NA NA NA NA
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3
pts
14.3
347 (57%)
10.8
337 (55%)
0.77
0.0045
15.1
93 (65%)
9.2
102 (71%)
0.59
0.003
NA NA NA NA NA NA
TC2 or IC2
pts
12.6 13 0.98b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
177 (14%)
TC1/2 or IC1/2
pts
NA NA NA NA NA NA 20.3 16.4 0.80b 12.4
129 (38%)
16.6
121 (36%)
0.70
226 (32%)
TC0/1/2 or IC0/1/2
pts
NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
TC1 or IC1
pts
12.7 9.7 0.87b NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA NA
334 (27%)
TC0 and IC0
pts
11.8
260 (42%)
8.9
271 (44%)
0.84b
0.0887
9.7
51 (35%)
9.7
41 (29%)
0.88b
0.601
17.1 14.1 0.82b 13.8
160 (47%)
12.5
171 (50%)
0.81b
339 (49%)

Notes:

a

Preliminary results with regard to OS, given the limited follow-up.

b

95% confidence interval (95% CI) crossing the unit.

Abbreviations: ABCP, atezolizumab, bevacizumab, carboplatin, paclitaxel; AcnP, atezolizumab, carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel; Atezo, atezolizumab; BCP, bevacizumab, carboplatin, paclitaxel; CnP, carboplatin, nab-paclitaxel; Doc, docetaxel; HR, hazard ratio; ITT, intention to treat; NA, not available; pts, number of patients; TC, tumor cell; IC, immune cell; WT population, including only EGFR and ALK wild-type patients.