Table 3.
Univariable and multivariable logistic regression model results comparing Sometimes Hazardous Drinkers (n= 171) with Always Hazardous Drinkers (n= 129), and using the former as the referent group. Statistically significant variables (p<.05) in bold.
| VARIABLE | UNIVARIABLE MODEL | MULTIVARIABLE MODEL | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR1 | 95% CI | AOR2 | 95% CI | |
| Age | 1.00 | 0.97, 1.02 | ||
| Number Sex Partner P6M | 1.00 | 0.99,1.00 | ||
| Number Anal Sex Partner – P6M | 1.00 | 0.98, 1.01 | ||
| Sexual Sensation Seeking Scale | 1.06 | 1.00, 1.12 | NOT SELECTED | |
| HAART Treatment Optimism Scale | 0.97 | 0.93, 1.02 | ||
| Cognitive Escape Scale | 1.05 | 1.01, 1.09 | NOT SELECTED | |
| Self-Esteem Scale | 1.07 | 1.01, 1.14 | 1.17 | 1.08, 1.26 |
| Social Support Scale | 1.05 | .097, 1.14 | 1.10 | 1.00, 1.22 |
| Loneliness Scale | 1.02 | 0.91, 1.14 | ||
| HAD Anxiety Scale | 1.08 | 1.01, 1.14 | NOT SELECTED | |
| HAD Depression Scale | 1.02 | 0.95, 1.09 | ||
| Self-Reported HIV Status | ||||
| Negative/Unknown | 1.00 | |||
| Positive | 0.77 | 0.42 1.41 | ||
| Annual Income | ||||
| <$30,000 | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| $30-$60,000 | 1.83 | 1.08, 3.11 | 2.06 | 1.11, 3.83 |
| >$60,000 | 1.66 | 0.80, 3.46 | 3.61 | 1.50, 8.68 |
| Ethnicity | ||||
| White | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Asian | 0.59 | 0.23, 1.49 | 0.65 | 0.23, 1.92 |
| Indigenous | 1.84 | 0.81, 4.18 | 3.86 | 1.42,10.50 |
| Other | 1.01 | 0.46, 2.24 | 1.40 | 0.57, 3.46 |
| Education | ||||
| Completed High School or Less | 1.00 | |||
| More Than High School | 1.01 | 0.56, 1.81 | ||
| Sexual Identity | ||||
| Gay | 1.00 | |||
| Bisexual/Other | 1.14 | 0.60, 2.14 | ||
| Housing | ||||
| Unstable | 1.00 | |||
| Stable | 1.03 | 0.50, 2.11 | ||
| Attended Pride Parade Past Year | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.20 | 0.74, 1.96 | ||
| Attended Gay Bar/Club P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 2.85 | 1.19, 6.83 | 3.89 | 1.48, 10.22 |
| Attended Gay-Specific Groups P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.90 | 0.56, 1.44 | ||
| Used Chat Lines to Seek Sex P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.46 | 0.21, 1.03 | ||
| Used Smart Phone Apps to Seek Sex P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.01 | 0.64, 1.61 | ||
| Used Internet Sites to Seek Sex P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0.68 | 0.43, 1.09 | 0.49 | 0.28, 0.85 |
| Read Gay Newspapers/Magazines P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.15 | 0.56, 2.36 | ||
| Condomless Anal Sex P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 1.16 | 0.62, 2.17 | 0.92 | 0.46, 1.82 |
| High Risk Sex | 2.40 | 1.39, 4.13 | 2.68 | 1.41, 5.06 |
| Attended Group Sex Event P 6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.51 | 0.89, 2.56 | ||
| Used Erectile Dysfunction Drug P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 0.76 | 0.42, 1.37 | 0.49 | 0.24, 1.01 |
| Used Poppers P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.53 | 0.95, 2.46 | ||
| Used Crystal Methamphetamine P6 M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.08 | 0.59, 1.95 | ||
| Used Ecstasy P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | 1.00 | ||
| Yes | 1.88 | 1.15, 3.09 | 1.98 | 1.10, 3.56 |
| Used GBH P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.83, | 0.46, 1.50 | ||
| Worked as an Escort P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.36 | 0. 12, 1.50 | ||
| Received Money for Sex P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.37 | 0.13, 1.02 | ||
| Received Drugs for Sex P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 1.13 | 0.49, 2.62 | ||
| Received Goods for Sex P6M | ||||
| No | 1.00 | |||
| Yes | 0.76 | 0.29, 1.99 | ||
Odds Ratio
Adjusted Odds Ratio
Not Selected by QIC