Table 2.
Discordant results: False positives and false negatives.
| Sample type | Media | Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| False positives | |||
| Urines | CHROM | 3 |
|
| Urines | COL | 3 | |
| Urines | MAC | 5 | |
| Isolates | CHROM | 3 | |
| Isolates | COL | 1 | |
| Total | 15 | ||
| False negatives | |||
| Urines | CHROM | 8 | Plates containing between 1 and 3 colonies were not detected by the algorithms (see Figs. G.1 and H.1).
|
| Urines | COL | 1 | |
| Isolates | CHROM | 29 | Some plates containing Lactobacillus fermentum (8), Candida albicans (6),Corynebacterium striatum (5), Micrococcus luteus (2), Streptococcus mitis group (2), Staphylococcus saprophyticus (2), Staphylococcus haemolyticus (1), Staphylococcus epidermidis (1), Aerococcus urinae (1) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1) were not detected by the algorithms (see Fig. G.1).
|
| Isolates | COL | 7 | Some plates containing between 1 to 4 colonies of Candida albicans (5), Streptococcus mitis group (1) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (1) were not detected by the algorithms (see Fig. H.1).
|
| Isolates | MAC | 1 | A plate containing one colony of Pseudomonas aeruginosa was not detected by the algorithm. The colony was located on the edge of the plate, which is a zone not included in image analysis (see Fig. I.1). |
| Total | 46 | ||