The Dice metric and contour distance metrics between automated segmentation and manual segmentation for short-axis images, as well between segmentations by different human observers
(a) Dice metric | ||||
Auto vs Manual | O1 vs O2 | O2 vs O3 | O3 vs O1 | |
(n = 600) | (n = 50) | (n = 50) | (n = 50) | |
LV cavity | 0.94 (0.04) | 0.94 (0.04) | 0.92 (0.04) | 0.93 (0.04) |
LV myocardium | 0.88 (0.03) | 0.88 (0.02) | 0.87 (0.03) | 0.88 (0.02) |
RV cavity | 0.90 (0.05) | 0.87 (0.06) | 0.88 (0.05) | 0.89 (0.05) |
(b) Mean contour distance (mm) | ||||
LV cavity | 1.04 (0.35) | 1.00 (0.25) | 1.30 (0.37) | 1.21 (0.48) |
LV myocardium | 1.14 (0.40) | 1.16 (0.34) | 1.19 (0.25) | 1.21 (0.36) |
RV cavity | 1.78 (0.70) | 2.00 (0.79) | 1.78 (0.45) | 1.87 (0.74) |
(c) Hausdorff distance (mm) | ||||
LV cavity | 3.16 (0.98) | 2.84 (0.70) | 3.31 (0.90) | 3.25 (0.96) |
LV myocardium | 3.92 (1.37) | 3.70 (1.16) | 3.82 (1.07) | 3.76 (1.21) |
RV cavity | 7.25 (2.70) | 7.56 (2.51) | 7.35 (2.19) | 7.14 (2.20) |
The first column shows the difference between automated and manual segmentations on a test set of 600 subjects. The second to fourth columns show the inter-observer variability, which is evaluated on a randomly selected set of 50 subjects, each being analysed by three different human observers (O1, O2, O3) independently. The mean and standard deviation (in parenthesis) of the metrics are reported