Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 11;4(9):e00777. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00777

Table 2.

Comparison of accelerometer parameters between horseback riding and exercise using the simulator.

HR
ES
Effect Size Cohen's d
Mean SD Mean SD
A-rms (m/s2) Rider's neck X 0.98 0.28 0.86 0.24 0.31
Y ** 1.24 0.74 0.88 0.32 0.56
Z ** 1.45 0.43 0.66 0.24 1.69
Rider's pelvis X * 0.77 0.17 0.65 0.17 0.49
Y 1.34 0.56 1.42 0.52 0.12
Z ** 1.42 0.22 0.63 0.17 3.57
Horse saddle X ** 1.09 0.20 0.80 0.07 1.30
Y 1.31 0.18 1.29 0.09 0.13
Z ** 0.95 0.09 0.41 0.06 4.84
AV-mav (deg/s) Rider's neck X * 18.55 6.15 22.66 5.27 0.56
Y ** 12.30 1.62 10.11 3.07 0.66
Z * 9.88 0.94 8.29 2.47 0.70
Rider's pelvis X 17.81 5.71 14.94 3.41 0.46
Y 10.43 3.48 10.96 3.33 0.10
Z 16.45 4.09 14.16 4.38 0.35
Horse saddle X 12.51 5.57 10.80 1.37 0.31
Y ** 9.32 1.54 7.45 0.50 1.21
Z ** 11.39 4.67 4.58 1.53 1.32

Values expressed as mean ± SD. HR and ES, n = 20. and ∗∗ Statistically significant difference between HR and ES (P < .05, P < .01, Wilcoxon signed-rank test). Abbreviations: HR, horseback riding; ES, exercise using the horse riding simulator; A-rms, acceleration converted into root mean square; AV-mav, angular velocity converted into mean absolute value; X, lateral axis; Y, longitudinal axis; Z, vertical axis.