Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;6:e5483. doi: 10.7717/peerj.5483

Table 5. Intercorrelations for measures as a function of incidents of trust vs. distrust.

Measure 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
1 Technology competence .08 .09 −.05 .08 .05 −.08 .07 .35** .24* .07 −.06 .11 .29* .51*** .12 .11 .27* −.08 .02 −.07 .15 −.03 −.14 −.14 −.10 .01 .05
2 Trust in technology .04 .03 −.02 .07 .08 .04 −.03 .10 .12 −.01 .23 .05 −.08 −.12 .09 .05 .02 .04 −.01 .02 .03 .16 −.06 .02 −.06 −.16 −.02
3 Regular frequency of use .17 .05 .29* .21 .10 −.09 .21 .4*** .27* .29* .22 .06 .05 .03 .39*** .30* −.01 .47*** .22 .13 .33** −.01 .13 −.01 .07 .35** −.19
4 Reliability .07 .02 −.06 .40*** .29* .22 .46*** .47*** .29* .35** .34** .27* .23 .06 .38** .07 .20 .23 .39** .35** .17 .24* −.20 .20 .34** .60*** −.41***
5 Controls .15 .07 .09 .50*** .29* −.01 .27* .22 .20 .16 .25* .18 .26* .05 .23 −.05 −.08 .12 .07 .02 .11 −.04 −.05 .00 .00 .15 −.21
6 Ease of use −.05 −.09 .14 .32*** .32*** .29* .33** .28* .06 .26* .32** .64*** .34** .16 .21 −.01 .10 −.02 .13 .17 .12 .21 −.15 .18 .06 .25* −.21
7 Response time .08 .03 −.04 .45*** .29** .35*** .30* .17 .14 .16 .22 .49*** .30* .03 .22 .11 .19 −.03 .20 .27* .13 .07 −.09 .27* .13 .28* −.08
8 Amount .01 −.12 −.01 .49*** .33*** .26** .41*** .45*** .34** .57*** .46*** .49*** .38** .21 .25* .20 .27* .15 .43*** .29* .16 .09 −.05 .22 −.08 .40*** −.37**
9 Relevance .21* −.14 .33*** .24* .26** .28** .23* .33*** .49*** .63*** .48*** .31** .29* .33** .45*** .31** .36** .38** .43*** .31* .45** .08 −.09 .15 .14 .43*** −.33**
10 Security .15 −.12 .21* .09 .14 −.14 .08 .12 .08 .33** .37** .21 .34** .27* .41*** .20 .24* .31** .42*** .42*** .15 −.05 .03 .17 .22 .34** −.14
11 Informativeness .13 −.03 .07 .50*** .32*** .25** .33*** .40*** .58*** .09 .73*** .32** .34** .17 .27* .19 .29* .20 .46*** .36** .23 .06 .11 .27* .05 .24* −.35**
12 Credibility .19* −.03 .04 .52*** .30** .19* .39*** .44*** .36*** .09 .62*** .36** .20 −.04 .29* .20 .23 .25* .37** .40*** .29* .15 −.03 .22 .07 .06 −.39***
13 Clarity −.04 −.01 .07 .43*** .42*** .62*** .47*** .39*** .46*** −.02 .5*** .33*** .39*** .15 .36** .10 .33** −.02 .28* .24* .13 .11 −.15 .29* −.04 .32** −.04
14 Participation .35*** .00 .15 .54*** .41*** .09 .36*** .40*** .27** .21* .32*** .33*** .25** .55*** .22 .04 .30* .01 .26* .27* −.05 .06 .01 .11 −.10 .30* −.18
15 Transparency .34*** .01 .15 .38*** .40*** .18 .39*** .32*** .28** .20* .35*** .24* .41*** .64*** .09 −.01 .27* −.06 .01 −.01 −.14 .05 −.03 .12 −.03 .23 −.08
16 Support .24* .17 .08 .27** .43*** .18 .36*** .28** .37*** .15 .40*** .35*** .38*** .35*** .21* .40*** .20 .20 .53*** .49*** .29* .07 −.07 .26* .00 .31** −.10
17 Error communication .18 .08 .28** .08 .32*** .02 .20* .18 .43*** .04 .26** .18 .18 .27** .19 .44*** .36** .25* .45*** .41*** .40** .14 −.13 .09 −.13 .10 .01
18 Perceived organizational support .15 .11 .08 .26* .34*** .10 .16 .23* .35*** .13 .44*** .23* .26** .27** .27** .32*** .35*** .06 .46*** .23 .17 .26* −.19 .15 .09 .21 −.01
19 Obligation to use −.09 .25** .31*** −.17 −.04 −.01 −.15 −.12 .08 −.12 −.06 .08 −.02 −.08 −.09 −.05 −.05 −.07 .17 .13 .63*** −.11 .23 −.10 .10 .17 −.02
20 Abilitya .15 .16 −.02 .45*** .31*** .13 .35*** .34*** .23* .03 .30** .40*** .41*** .47*** .40*** .48*** .30** .32*** −.02 .64*** .23 .33** −.08 .33** .11 .39*** −.24*
21 Attitudea .04 .19 .11 .33*** .33*** .16 .35*** .20* .32** .04 .32** .31** .43*** .29** .30** .48*** .43*** .43*** .05 .65*** .26* .27* −.17 .24* .19 .34** −.30*
22 Accountabilitya .15 .24* .05 −.02 .03 −.03 .01 −.11 .15 −.01 .11 .00 −.05 −.01 −.05 .18 .27** .14 .11 .16 .25* .00 .00 −.02 −.02 .03 −.02
23 Well-being .13 .01 .02 .57*** .38*** .38*** .41*** .39*** .34*** .06 .43*** .49*** .48*** .53*** .40*** .36*** .19* .32*** −.18 .45*** .36*** .03 −.61 .36** .10 .31* −.22
24 Stress −.29** .03 −.02 −.33*** −.16 −.24* −.27** −.39*** −.24* −.09 −.33*** −.49*** −.28** −.34*** −.26** −.28** −.01 −.17 .04 −.30** −.29** −.16 −.57*** −.16 −.01 −.27* .00
25 Performance .15 .02 .00 .68*** .41*** .37*** .44*** .48*** .37*** .03 .57*** .51*** .51*** .51*** .35*** .45*** .20* .36*** −.14 .48*** .45*** .14 .74*** −.54*** .01 .21 −.08
26 Post-situational frequency of use .14 .14 .15 .39*** .20* .21* .26** .21* .25** .01 .25** .30** .41*** .34*** .22* .26** .16 .20* .11 .36*** .35*** .13 .43*** −.22* .42** .51*** −.34**
27 Post-situational satisfaction with use .10 .06 .08 .60*** .41*** .40*** .39*** .46*** .38*** .02 .44*** .50*** .47*** .44*** .36*** .35*** .14 .29** .11 .44*** .31** .09 .71*** −.48*** .69*** .60*** −.35**
28 Situational trust /distrust .18 .16 .13 .72*** .42*** .26** .37*** .36*** .34*** .13 .49*** .63*** .34*** .46*** .36*** .31** .26** .30** −.01 .44*** .34*** .06 .57*** −.36*** .58*** .31** .49***

Notes.

Intercorrelations for the distrust condition (n = 70) are presented above the diagonal, and intercorrelations for the trust condition (n = 109) are presented below the diagonal.

a

Reduced n due to response category “does not apply”, minimum n = 95 in the trust condition and n = 63 in the distrust condition.

*

p < .05.

**

p < .01.

***

p < .001.