. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 15.

Published in final edited form as: J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2011 Jan;37(1):187–205. doi: 10.1037/a0021326

Table 2. RTs, Error Rates, and Priming in Experiment 1 as a Function of Task and Stimulus Language.

Encoding Condition	RT (ms)			Error Rate
Encoding Task → Test Task	L1^a	L2	Overall	L1	L2	Overall
Not Presented → Word Classification	978	1123	1050	.05	.05	.05
Translation → Word Classification	947	1045	996	.04	.05	.05
Priming	32^*	78^**	55^**	.00	.00	.00
Not Presented → Translation	1444	1418	1431	.22	.16	.19
Word Classification → Translation	1389	1347	1368	.21	.14	.18
Priming	55	71^**	63^**	.01	.02	.01

p < .05

^**

p < .01

Stimulus language for each item was held constant from study to test.