Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 2;2018:3061974. doi: 10.1155/2018/3061974

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis.

Surname (ref) Year Country Ethnicity Cancer type Control source Genotype method Case Control MAF HWE Score
Val/Val Val/Ala Ala/Ala All Val/Val Val/Ala Ala/Ala All
Ambrosone et al. [60] 1999 USA Caucasian Breast PB PCR-RFLP 16 53 45 114 25 62 23 110 0.49 0.181 12
Mitrunen et al. [10] 2001 Finland Caucasian Breast PB PCR-RFLP 124 255 100 479 153 231 98 482 0.44 0.526 13
Wang et al. [7] 2001 USA Caucasian Lung HB Pyrosequencing 305 551 245 1101 288 628 323 1239 0.49 0.609 9
Green et al. [61] 2002 UK Caucasian Breast HB PCR-RFLP 13 17 9 39 8 22 6 36 0.47 0.175 5
Hirvonen et al. [62] 2002 Finland Caucasian MPM PB PCR-RFLP 6 11 3 20 15 36 12 63 0.48 0.248 9
Levine et al. [63] 2002 USA Mixed CRC PB PCR-RFLP 139 209 108 456 140 234 121 495 0.48 0.237 12
Li et al. [64] 2002 USA Caucasian Pancreatic PB PCR-RFLP 10 11 3 24 8 10 5 23 0.43 0.580 6
Stoehlmacher et al. [13] 2002 USA Caucasian CRC PB TaqMan 25 65 35 125 21 64 37 122 0.43 0.456 5
Egan et al. [16] 2003 USA Caucasian Breast PB PCR-RFLP 102 250 118 470 130 240 127 497 0.50 0.446 10
Lin et al. [65]a 2003 China Asian Lung HB PCR-RFLP 139 59 (Val/Ala + Ala/Ala) 198 233 99 (Val/Ala + Ala/Ala) 332 NA NA 10
Woodson et al. [66] 2003 USA Caucasian Prostate PB MALDI-TOF MS 43 98 58 199 49 102 40 191 0.48 0.330 12
Cai et al. [11] 2004 China Asian Breast PB PCR-RFLP 831 266 28 1125 884 290 23 1197 0.14 0.890 15
Hung et al. [8] 2004 Italy Caucasian Bladder HB PCR-RFLP 68 89 44 201 45 115 54 214 0.48 0.262 9
Ichimura et al. [67] 2004 Japan Asian Bladder HB PCR-RFLP 169 41 3 213 157 48 4 209 0.13 0.882 11
Knight et al. [68] 2004 Canada Caucasian Breast PB PCR-SSCP 107 187 105 399 90 195 87 372 0.50 0.350 14
Lan et al. [17] 2004 China Asian Lung PB Real-time PCR 93 23 3 119 81 30 1 112 0.14 0.321 10
Millikan et al. [69] 2004 USA African Breast PB TaqMan 259 372 129 760 196 357 124 677 0.45 0.083 13
Millikan et al. [69] 2004 USA Caucasian Breast PB TaqMan 273 681 311 1265 266 586 283 1135 0.49 0.269 13
Olson et al. [70] 2004 USA Caucasian Ovarian HB MALDI-TOF MS 27 64 27 118 51 87 39 177 0.47 0.869 9
Tamimi et al. [71] 2004 USA Caucasian Breast PB Mixedd 255 468 245 968 297 612 296 1205 0.50 0.584 15
Bergman et al. [9] 2005 Sweden Caucasian Breast PB Sequencing 33 73 12 118 43 88 43 174 0.50 0.879 11
Cheng et al. [72] 2005 China Asian Breast HB MassARRAY 343 115 11 469 545 183 11 739 0.14 0.322 11
Gaudet et al. [38] 2005 USA Caucasian Breast PB MALDI-TOF MS 253 511 270 1034 264 539 281 1084 0.49 0.862 14
Landi et al. [73] 2005 Spain Caucasian CRC HB APEX 94 164 77 335 88 151 64 303 0.46 0.958 5
Li et al. [74] 2005 USA Caucasian Prostate PB PCR-RFLP 132 288 147 567 190 379 195 764 0.50 0.829 14
Terry et al. [75] 2005 USA Caucasian Bladder HB MALDI-TOF MS 54 122 59 235 57 103 54 214 0.49 0.586 8
Ho et al. [18]c 2006 China Asian Lung HB PCR-RFLP 176 58 0 234 180 52 7 239 0.14 0.184 7
Lightfoot et al. [76] 2006 USA and UK Caucasian NHL PB TaqMan 211 463 229 903 358 713 371 1442 0.50 0.676 13
Slanger et al. [77] 2006 Germany Caucasian Breast PB TaqMan 144 318 152 614 263 528 289 1080 0.49 0.477 14
Wang et al. [78] 2006 USA Mixed NHL PB TaqMan 285 545 290 1120 240 486 211 937 0.48 0.240 13
Cengiz et al. [15]b 2007 Turkey Caucasian Bladder HB PCR-RFLP 34 (Val/Val + Val/Ala) 17 51 34 (Val/Val + Val/Ala) 19 53 NA NA 7
Choi et al. [37] 2007 USA Caucasian Prostate PB MALDI-TOF MS 112 239 104 455 293 610 311 1214 0.49 0.857 13
Choi et al. [37] 2007 USA African Prostate PB MALDI-TOF MS 7 15 6 28 39 52 31 122 0.47 0.112 10
Ergen et al. [79]c 2007 Turkey Caucasian Prostate HB PCR-RFLP 19 25 6 50 32 18 0 50 0.18 0.121 7
Han et al. [80] 2007 USA Caucasian Skin PB TaqMan 184 402 187 773 196 425 212 833 0.49 0.549 15
Johnatty et al. [81] 2007 Australia Caucasian Ovarian PB Real-time PCR 123 273 147 543 276 546 308 1130 0.49 0.269 11
Kang et al. [82] 2007 USA Caucasian Prostate PB TaqMan 275 578 297 1150 376 686 320 1382 0.48 0.835 13
Kang et al. [82] 2007 USA African Prostate PB TaqMan 31 57 15 103 122 194 79 395 0.45 0.906 11
Landi et al. [83] 2007 Italy Caucasian MPM HB APEX 16 27 37 80 98 170 81 349 0.48 0.661 9
di Martino et al. [84] 2007 USA Caucasian Esophageal HB PCR-RFLP 32 73 35 140 20 39 34 93 0.42 0.171 8
Murphy et al. [12] 2007 Ireland Caucasian Esophageal PB SNaPshot 44 103 60 207 60 113 48 221 0.47 0.703 11
Arsova-Sarafinovska et al. [85] 2008 Turkey Caucasian Prostate HB Real-time PCR 19 46 20 85 41 73 37 151 0.49 0.690 9
Cooper et al. [86] 2008 USA Caucasian Prostate PB TaqMan 602 1352 680 2634 423 789 424 1636 0.50 0.152 15
Dalan et al. [87] 2008 Turkey Caucasian Ovarian PB PCR-RFLP 30 19 6 55 28 17 6 51 0.28 0.196 7
Justenhoven et al. [88] 2008 Germany Caucasian Breast PB MALDI-TOF MS 159 312 133 604 163 313 145 621 0.49 0.824 14
Mikhak et al. [89] 2008 USA Caucasian Prostate PB TaqMan 156 320 166 642 162 331 159 652 0.50 0.695 14
Rajaraman et al. [90] 2008 USA Caucasian Brain HB TaqMan 129 262 123 514 122 220 109 451 0.49 0.617 10
Wheatley-Price et al. [91] 2008 USA Caucasian Pancreatic HB TaqMan 33 58 31 122 61 165 105 331 0.43 0.786 11
Zienolddiny et al. [92] 2008 Norway Caucasian Lung PB APEX 74 175 70 319 119 178 78 375 0.45 0.448 12
Eras-Erdogan et al. [93] 2009 Turkey Caucasian Breast PB PCR-RFLP 107 113 30 250 150 141 39 330 0.33 0.508 8
Funke et al. [94] 2009 Germany Caucasian CRC PB Pyrosequencing 136 321 166 623 146 294 163 603 0.49 0.554 12
Iguchi et al. [95] 2009 USA Mixed Prostate HB PCR-RFLP 41 86 60 187 40 96 39 175 0.50 0.199 6
Kostrykina et al. [96] 2009 Russia Caucasian Breast PB TaqMan 123 233 119 475 103 183 90 376 0.48 0.622 12
Tong et al. [14]a 2009 Korea Asian Cervical HB SNaPshot 72 27 (Val/Ala + Ala/Ala) 99 194 69 (Val/Ala + Ala/Ala) 263 NA NA 7
Ermolenko et al. [97] 2010 Russia Caucasian Breast HB Real-time PCR 228 454 239 921 121 235 104 460 0.48 0.620 9
Ezzikouri et al. [98] 2010 Morocco Caucasian HCC PB PCR-RFLP 21 45 30 96 81 101 40 222 0.41 0.388 11
Ibrahim et al. [99] 2010 Egypt African HCC HB PCR-RFLP 16 32 27 75 19 28 11 58 0.43 0.904 8
Kim et al. [100] 2010 Korea Asian Breast HB TaqMan 234 66 4 304 279 90 7 376 0.14 0.934 11
Méplan et al. [101] 2010 Czech Caucasian CRC HB AS-PCR 172 358 189 719 165 318 174 657 0.49 0.415 9
Tang et al. [102] 2010 USA Mixed Pancreatic HB TaqMan 143 278 137 558 167 309 162 638 0.50 0.429 11
Wu et al. [103] 2010 China Asian Oral HB Real-time PCR 91 28 2 121 88 32 2 122 0.15 0.637 9
Yi et al. [104] 2010 China Asian Gastric HB SNaPshot 85 48 7 140 119 27 1 147 0.10 0.690 9
Cerne et al. [105] 2011 Slovenia Caucasian Breast HB TaqMan 118 269 143 530 65 134 71 270 0.51 0.910 8
Cheng et al. [106]b 2011 USA Mixed Prostate PB MALDI-TOF MS 152 (Val/Val + Val/Ala) 50 202 1054 (Val/Val + Val/Ala) 374 1428 NA NA 13
Mohelnikova-Duchonova et al. [107] 2011 Czech Caucasian Pancreatic PB Real-time PCR 66 121 48 235 73 134 58 265 0.47 0.812 10
Zhang et al. [108]b 2011 USA Mixed Pancreatic PB TaqMan 129 (Val/Val + Val/Ala) 60 189 365 (Val/Val + Val/Ala) 121 486 NA NA 13
Atoum et al. [109]c 2012 Jordan Caucasian Breast HB PCR-RFLP 22 43 0 65 11 6 0 17 0.18 0.377 6
Farawela et al. [110] 2012 Egypt African NHL PB PCR-RFLP 10 50 40 100 12 49 39 100 0.37 0.568 9
Hemelrijck et al. [111] 2012 Germany Caucasian Prostate PB MassARRAY 50 100 53 203 80 190 90 360 0.49 0.285 13
Kucukgergin et al. [112] 2012 Turkey Caucasian Bladder HB PCR-RFLP 52 68 37 157 89 99 36 224 0.38 0.341 8
Kucukgergin et al. [113] 2012 Turkey Caucasian Prostate HB PCR-RFLP 43 65 26 134 66 69 24 159 0.37 0.398 8
Tsai et al. [114]a 2012 China Asian Breast HB Real-time PCR 192 68 (Val/Ala + Ala/Ala) 260 138 86 (Val/Ala + Ala/Ala) 224 NA NA 8
Ye et al. [115] 2012 China Asian NPC HB PCR 88 15 2 105 110 23 3 136 0.11 0.191 8
Zhao et al. [116] 2012 China Asian Brain HB OpenArray 241 107 31 379 293 81 6 380 0.12 0.882 11
Amr et al. [117] 2013 Egypt African Bladder PB TaqMan 127 188 99 414 109 160 87 356 0.47 0.065 13
Ashour et al. [118] 2013 Egypt African Lung PB TaqMan 17 27 6 50 21 25 4 50 0.33 0.355 9
Attatippaholkun and Wikainapakul [119] 2013 Thailand Asian Cervical HB SNaPshot 64 39 4 107 84 48 3 135 0.20 0.184 7
Attatippaholkun et al. [119] 2013 Thailand Asian Breast HB SNaPshot 82 54 5 141 84 48 3 135 0.20 0.184 7
Eken et al. [120] 2013 Turkey Caucasian Prostate HB Real-time PCR 7 17 9 33 31 37 13 81 0.39 0.726 8
Han et al. [121] 2013 Korea Asian Pancreatic PB PCR-SSCP 190 85 19 294 236 59 5 300 0.12 0.558 12
Méplan et al. [122] 2013 Denmark Caucasian Breast PB TaqMan 228 485 226 939 237 494 227 958 0.49 0.331 14
Atilgan et al. [123] 2014 Turkey Caucasian RCC HB Probe 10 17 14 41 23 19 8 50 0.35 0.244 5
Liu et al [124] 2014 China Asian OSCC HB PCR-RFLP 272 83 7 362 296 61 1 358 0.09 0.243 10
Oskina et al. [125] 2014 Russia Caucasian Prostate PB TaqMan 92 194 94 380 86 152 99 337 0.48 0.076 12
Brown et al. [126] 2015 USA Mixed Medulloblastoma PB Illumina SNP chip 3 15 8 26 18 18 9 45 0.40 0.264 5
Jablonska et al. [127] 2015 Polish Caucasian Breast PB Real-time PCR 32 75 29 136 41 92 50 183 0.48 0.915 10
Parlaktas et al. [128] 2015 Turkey Caucasian Prostate HB Probe 23 23 3 49 24 20 5 49 0.31 0.784 7
Su et al. [129] 2015 China Asian HCC HB PCR-RFLP 334 78 10 422 359 107 13 479 0.14 0.150 7

MAF: minor allele frequency; HWE: Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium; HB: hospital-based; PB: population based; NA, not applicable; PCR-RFLP: polymorphism chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism; MALDI-TOF MS: matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization-time-of-flight mass spectrometry; PCR-SSCP: polymorphism chain reaction-single strand conformation polymorphism; APEX: arrayed primer extension; AS-PCR: allele specific-polymorphism chain reaction; MPM: malignant pleural mesothelioma; CRC: colorectal cancer; NHL: non-Hodgkin's lymphoma; HCC: hepatocellular carcinoma; RCC: renal cell carcinoma; OSCC: oral squamous cell carcinoma. aLin et al. [65], Tong et al. [14], and Tsai et al. [114] were only calculated for the dominant model. bCengiz et al. [15], Cheng et al. [106], and Zhang et al. [108] were only calculated for the recessive model. cHo et al. [18], Ergen et al. [79], and Atoum et al. [109] were only calculated for the heterozygous model, dominant model, and allele comparison, and the number of Ala/Ala genotype was zero. dMixed: which included more than one genotyping methods.