Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 2;2018:6057357. doi: 10.1155/2018/6057357

Table 2.

Pearson Correlation analysis of weather parameters versus consult type and mechanism of injury. Statistically significant values are in bold.

Type of Consult v. Temperature v. Wind v. Total Precipitation
Total Consults r=0.30, p<0.001 r=-0.01, p=0.776 r=-0.04, p=0.407
Lower Extremity (Foot, ankle, pilon) r=0.15, p=0.002 r=0.01, p=0.764 r=<-0.01, p=0.999
Long Bone (Tibia, Femur) r=0.01, =0.922 r=-0.03, p=0.508 r=-0.05, p=0.373
Pelvis (hip, acetabulum, pelvic ring) r=-0.002, p=0.967 r=<0.01, p=0.989 r=0.03, p=0.595
Upper Extremity (BBFFx, DR, Humerus) r=0.03, p=0.584 r<-0.01, p=0.993 r=-0.03, p=0.565

Mechanism of Injury

GSW r=0.04, p=0.381 r=-0.03, p=0.514 r=-0.091, p=0.067
MVC r=0.06, p=0.215 r=0.06, p=0.257 r=0.02, p=0.687
MCC r=0.19, p<0.001 r=0.02, p=0.665 r=-0.12, p=0.013
Total Penetrating r=0.04, p=0.385 r=-0.02, p=0.664 r=-0.09, p=0.063
Total Blunt r=0.20, p<0.001 r=0.04, p=0.386 r=-0.072, p=0.146