Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 16.
Published in final edited form as: Burns. 2006 Jul 11;32(6):755–764. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2006.01.011

Table 3.

Statistical significance of fitted TAC parameters

For experimental group Compared to p-Valuea,b

A B C
1.85 A saline 1.85 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 0.035 0.856 0.023
1.85 A 68 mg poloxamer-188 0.271 0.569 0.912
1.85 A 17 mg 10 kDa dextran 0.217 0.360 0.845
1.85 A 17 mg 40 kDa dextran 0.775 0.335 0.905
0 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 0.125 0.244 0.003
0 A saline 0.132 0.177 0.0003
0 A saline 1.85 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 0.0003 0.544 0.0004
1.85 A 68 mg poloxamer-188 0.006 0.036 0.0001
1.85 A 17 mg 10 kDa dextran 0.419 0.774 0.006
1.85 A 17 mg 40 kDa dextran 0.038 0.016 0.0002
0 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 0.798 0.979 0.020
1.85 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 1.85 A 68 mg poloxamer-188 0.027 0.642 0.007
1.85 A 17 mg 10 kDa dextran 0.241 0.521 0.136
1.85 A 17 mg 40 kDa dextran 0.019 0.394 0.029
0 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 0.0001 0.610 0.007
1.85 A 68 mg poloxamer-188 1.85 A 17 mg 10 kDa dextran 0.325 0.388 0.810
1.85 A 17 mg 40 kDa dextran 0.274 0.847 0.833
0 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 0.002 0.065 0.0009
1.85 A 17 mg 10 kDa dextran 1.85 A 17 mg 40 kDa dextran 0.111 0.129 0.902
0-A 17-mg poloxamer-188 0.496 0.803 0.033
1.85 A 17 mg 40 kDa dextran 0 A 17 mg poloxamer-188 0.036 0.033 0.003
a

p-Value for Student’s t-statistic computed between the corresponding pair of fitted parameter values for the two datasets indicated.

b

Bold values indicate the corresponding pair of fitted parameters is significantly different at the p < 0.01 level.