Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug;59(4):165–177. doi: 10.3325/cmj.2018.59.165

Table 5.

Summary of logistic regression analyses of high religiosity (vs non-high) and moderate or high nicotine dependence (vs none or low) outcomes*

Moderate/high nicotine dep
High religiosity
Outcomes OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
High religiosity
0.25 (0.04-1.31)
0.102


Moderate/high nicotine dependence


0.36 (0.06-1.81)
0.212
Combat exposure score
1.12 (0.96-1.34)
0.159
0.95 (0.83-1.06)
0.365
PCL re-experiencing (cluster B)
0.99 (0.77-1.31)
0.964
1.09 (0.94-1.29)
0.254
PCL negativity + hyperarousal (cluster D+E)
1.24 (1.11-1.45)
<0.001
1.05 (0.98-1.15)
0.182
HAM-D without item 3
1.01 (0.80-1.26)
0.917
0.84 (0.71-0.98)
0.025
Suicidality (MADRS item 10 + HAM-D item 3)
0.47 (0.19-0.83)
0.005
0.95 (0.65-1.44)
0.775
Age (by 1 year)
0.93 (0.82-1.05)
0.250
0.92 (0.83-1.01)
0.091
Cardiovascular comorbidity or DM 1.74 (0.35-10.2) 0.503 1.14 (0.34-3.84) 0.829

*OR – odds ratio, CI – confidence interval, PCL – Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Check List, HAM-D – Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, MADRS – Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, DM – diabetes mellitus.