Part A (only 1 score for each section possible) |
1. Study size: number of patients |
>60 |
10 |
41-60 |
7 |
20-40 |
4 |
<20 or not stated |
0 |
2. Mean follow-up (months) |
>24 |
5 |
12-24 |
2 |
<12 or not stated or unclear |
0 |
3. Number of different surgical procedures included in each reported outcome |
One surgical procedure |
10 |
More than one surgical procedure, but >90% of subjects undergoing the one procedure |
7 |
Not stated or unclear or <90% of subjects undergoing the one procedure |
0 |
4. Type of study |
Randomized controlled trial |
15 |
Prospective cohort study |
10 |
Retrospective cohort study |
0 |
5. Diagnostic certainty |
In all |
5 |
In >80% |
3 |
In <80% |
0 |
6. Description of surgical procedure given |
Adequate (technique stated and necessary details of that type of procedure given) |
5 |
Fair (technique only stated without elaboration) |
3 |
Inadequate or not stated or unclear |
0 |
7. Description of postoperative rehabilitation |
Well described |
10 |
Not adequately described |
5 |
Protocol not reported |
0 |
Part B (scores possible for each option in each section) |
1. Outcome criteria |
Outcome measures clearly defined |
2 |
Timing of outcome assessment clearly stated |
2 |
Use of outcome criteria that has reported good reliability |
3 |
Use of outcome with good sensitivity |
3 |
2. Procedure for assessing outcomes |
Subjects recruited (results not taken from surgeon’s files) |
5 |
Investigator independent of surgeon |
4 |
Written assessment |
3 |
Completion of assessment by subjects themselves with minimal investigator assistance |
3 |
4. Description of subject selection process |
Selection criteria reported and unbiased |
5 |
Recruitment rate reported >80% |
5 |
Recruitment rate reported <80% |
3 |
Eligible subjects not included in the study satisfactorily accounted for or 100% recruitment |
5 |