Skip to main content
. 2017 Apr 10;9(4):339–345. doi: 10.1177/1947603517700956

Table 1.

The Modified Coleman Methodology Score.

Section Number or Factor Score
Part A (only 1 score for each section possible)
1.  Study size: number of patients >60 10
41-60 7
20-40 4
<20 or not stated 0
2.  Mean follow-up (months) >24 5
12-24 2
<12 or not stated or unclear 0
3.  Number of different surgical procedures included in each reported outcome One surgical procedure 10
More than one surgical procedure, but >90% of subjects undergoing the one procedure 7
Not stated or unclear or <90% of subjects undergoing the one procedure 0
4.  Type of study Randomized controlled trial 15
Prospective cohort study 10
Retrospective cohort study 0
5.  Diagnostic certainty In all 5
In >80% 3
In <80% 0
6.  Description of surgical procedure given Adequate (technique stated and necessary details of that type of procedure given) 5
Fair (technique only stated without elaboration) 3
Inadequate or not stated or unclear 0
7.  Description of postoperative rehabilitation Well described 10
Not adequately described 5
Protocol not reported 0
Part B (scores possible for each option in each section)
1.  Outcome criteria Outcome measures clearly defined 2
Timing of outcome assessment clearly stated 2
Use of outcome criteria that has reported good reliability 3
Use of outcome with good sensitivity 3
2.  Procedure for assessing outcomes Subjects recruited (results not taken from surgeon’s files) 5
Investigator independent of surgeon 4
Written assessment 3
Completion of assessment by subjects themselves with minimal investigator assistance 3
4.  Description of subject selection process Selection criteria reported and unbiased 5
Recruitment rate reported >80% 5
Recruitment rate reported <80% 3
Eligible subjects not included in the study satisfactorily accounted for or 100% recruitment 5