Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 16;115(6):1055–1067. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2018.08.010

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Mesoscale force response of actin-microtubule composites display a ϕT-dependent crossover from strain-softening to strain-stiffening. (A) The ensemble-averaged force <Fi(x)> applied to the moving bead by actin-microtubule composites of varying tubulin molar fraction ϕT (listed in legend) is plotted. Data shown are an average over 25 individual (i) measurements. Dotted vertical lines denote the displacements over which <Fi(x)> and K(x) are averaged in (B) and (D). Inset shows <Fi(x)> on a linear scale. (B) The initial <Fi(x)> value, F0 (open circles), and the average of <Fi(x)> values plotted over different bead displacements, xfxi, denoted as Fxfxi. Displacements of xfxi = 0.5 − 0 μm (F0.5 − 0, closed circles), 10 – 0.5 (F10−0.5, open squares), and 30 – 10 (F30−10, closed squares) are shown. (C) Stiffness, K(x), is calculated as the derivative of the average force with respect to bead displacement (K(x) = d<Fi(x)>/dx). (D) The initial K value, K0, and the average of K(x) values plotted over different displacements (K0.5−0, K10−0.5, K30−10). Displacements and symbol scheme are the same as in (B). (E and F) The dependence of force and stiffness on the speed of the bead displacement for ϕT = 0.1 (orange, left), 0.5 (green, middle), and 0.9 (purple, right) composites is presented. F0, F0.5−0, F10−0.5, and F30−10 (E) and K0, K0.5−0, K10−0.5, and K30−10 (F) are shown as a function of bead speed, with the symbol scheme the same as in (B) and (D). To see this figure in color, go online.