Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 31;34(4):167–174. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.08.02

Table 1.

Morbidity and mortality after an intersphincteric resection

Study Year No. Anastomotic leakage (%) Other complications (%) Mortality (%) Overall surgical morbidity (%)
Kohler [11] 2000 31 48 (surgery was needed in 16) Stricture, 9.7; wound complication, 6.5; voiding disturbance, 6.5; ileus, 3.2 0
Tiret [6] 2003 26 11 Wound complication, 3.8 0 30
Saito [7] 2004 35 11.4 Perianal abscess, 11.4; wound, 2.9; bleeding, 5.7 0 31
Schiessel [14] 2005 121 5.1 Stricture, 9.4 0.8 7.7
Saito [15] 2006 228 10.1 Stricture, 3.1; pelvic abscess, 4.4; bleeding, 1.3 0.4 24
Chamlou [18] 2007 90 8.8 - 0 18.8
Portier [17] 2007 105 - Local septic complication, 8.7 (CAA, 7.6) 1.2 (CAA, 0)
Akasu [19] 2007 106 12 - 1 33
Bretagnol [13] 2004 40 8 (CAA, 14) Stricture, 5 (CAA, 3) -
Weiser [21] 2009 44 5 Stricture, 16 - 31.8
Baek [25] 2013 89 Lap (8.1), robotic (8.5) Intrabdominal abscess: Lap (8.1), robotic (8.5) Ileus: Lap (5.4), robotic (2.1) - Lap (27), robotic (19.1)

CAA, coloanal anastomosis; Lap, laparoscopic.