Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 12;11:1835–1847. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S159729

Table 2.

Bivariate comparison of patients’ characteristics across levels of certainty of neuropathic pain diagnosis

Demographics CNP (N=53)
PNP (N=281)
Level of certainty of CNP diagnosis
Raw OR (95% CI)a
Level of certainty of PNP diagnosis
Raw OR (95% CI)a
Def
(N=43)b
Pos–Pro
(N=10)b
(Def/Pos–Pro) p Def
(N=208)b
Pos–Pro
(N=73)b
(Def/Pos–Pro) p
Sex (being female) [n (%)] 25 (58.1) 8 (80.0) 0.35 (0.07–1.83) 0.356 n=204 n=73 0.68 (0.39–1.21) 0.191
125 (61.3) 51 (69.9)
Current age (years) [mean (SD)] 59.7 (15.9) 57.5 (16.1) 0.641c n=207 59.5 (14.1) 0.061c
55.6 (15.8)
Ethnicity (being of Caucasian origin) [n (%)] 31 (72.1) 7 (70.0) 1.11 (0.25–5.00) 0.895 n=208 n=72 1.62 (0.81–3.24) 0.166
179 (86.1) 57 (79.2)
Work status (being retired vs. any other) 17 (39.5) 4 (40.0) 0.98 (0.24–4.00) 0.978 n=208 n=72 0.99 (0.57–1.75) 0.987
[n (%)] 72 (34.6) 25 (34.7)
Work status (being active vs. any other) 8 (18.6) 4 (40.0) 0.34 (0.08–1.51) 0.300 n=208 n=72 0.97 (0.56–1.71) 0.928
[n (%)] 71 (34.1) 25 (34.7)
Administrative data
Type of contact (initial vs. follow-up) n=41 3 (30.0) 1.17 (0.26–5.94) 0.841 n=202 n=71 0.78 (0.42–1.46) 0.439
[n initial (%)] 11 (26.8) 58 (28.7) 17 (23.9)
Referral:
From Primary Care vs. other [n Primary 3 (7.0) n=9 0.26 (0.04–1.87) 0.430 n=206 n=73 0.92 (0.47–1.83) 0.817
Care (%)] 2 (22.2) 37 (18.0) 14 (19.2)
From Traumatology vs. other n=40 n=7 0.0 0.404 n=169 n=59 1.80 (0.90–3.60) 0.094
[n Traumatology (%)] 8 (20.0) 3(42.9) 33(0.06–1.80) 57 (33.7) 13 (22.0)
From Neurology/Neurosurgery vs. other n=7 n=7 8.12 (0.89–73.84) 0.089 n=169 n=59 1.52 (0.71–3.27) 0.283
[n Neurology (%)] 23 (57.5) 1 (14.3) 40 (23.7) 10 (16.9)
Clinical data
Pain topography: head-column-trunk [n (%)] 26 (65.0) 6 (60.0) 1.24 (0.28–5.12) 0.768 n=174 n=63 1.25 (0.65–2.41) 0.500
52 (29.9) 16 (25.4)
Pain topography: upper limbs [n (%)] n=40 1 (10.0) 8.14 (0.92–70.41) 0.071 n=174 n=63 2.02 (1.00–4.08) 0.048
19 (47.5) 56 (32.2) 12 (19.0)
Pain topography: lower limbs [n (%)] n=40 2 (20.0) 5.41 (1.02–28.79) 0.034 n=174 n=63 0.46 (0.26–0.82) 0.008
23 (57.5) 66 (37.9) 36 (57.1)
Pain topography: other [n (%)] n=40 1 (10.0) n=174 n=63 0.90 (0.27–2.98) 0.862
0 (0.0) 10 (4.2) 4 (6.3)
Duration of pain symptoms (years) n=32 n=7 0.730d n=157 n=58 0.329d
[mean (SD)] 5.4 (7.1) 6.4 (8.3) 3.8 (4.8) 4.78 (6.5)
Current pain intensity (cm in VAS) 6.6 (1.9) 5.8 (1.9) 0.206c n=206 n=72 0.518d
[mean (SD)] 6.3 (2.1) 6.5 (2.2)
Comorbid depression [n (%)] n=41 n=8 0.81 (0.14–4.57) 0.807 n=174 n=62 1.23 (0.68–2.22) 0.497
29 (70.7) 6 (75.0) 76 (43.7) 24 (38.7)
Comorbid anxiety [n (%)] n=41 n=8 0.35 (0.06–1.94) 0.396 n=174 n=62 0.84 (0.47–1.51) 0.564
21 (51.2) 6 (75.0) 88 (50.6) 34 (54.8)
Comorbid sleep disorders [n (%)] n=41 n=8 3.10 (0.65–14.73) 0.299 n=174 n=62 0.71 (0.39–1.29) 0.261
31 (75.6) 4 (50.0) 98 (56.3) 40 (64.5)
Other comorbidities [n (%)] n=41 n=8 n=174 n=62 0.81 (0.35–1.87) 0.619
6 (14.6) 0 (0) 21 (12.1) 9 (14.5)
Adequate treatment for pain [n (%)] 24 (55.8) 4 (40.0) 1.89 (0.47–7.69) 0.582 n=192 n=70 1.41 (0.80–2.46) 0.232
90 (46.9) 27 (38.6)
Current health status (EuroQol-5D) 44.1 (21.7) 39.3 (20.0) 0.524c n=204 n=71 0.315d
[mean (SD)] 53.3 (20.7) 49.8 (24.4)

Notes:

a

OR higher and lower than 1 indicate, respectively, greater and smaller probability of a definite diagnosis of neuropathic pain in the category cited (for example, for females with regard to males).

b

Percentages are calculated using the available cases for each variable (usually less than the total number of cases, N). Mantel–Haenszel test for qualitative variables.

c

Student’s t-test.

d

Mann–Whitney U test.

Abbreviations: CNP, central neuropathic pain; Def, definite; OR, odds ratio; PNP, peripheral neuropathic pain; Pos, possible; Pro, probable; VAS, visual analog scale.