Table 4.
Paired diets, test diet [reference diet]‡ | P-value$ | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feed preference,† % | 1. B. napus CM [SBM] | 2. B. juncea CM [SBM] | 3. B. juncea CM [B. napus CM] | SEM|| | Among pairs | Pair 1 | Pair 2 | Pair 3 |
Period 1 | ||||||||
Day 1 | 14.7b | 9.7b | 39.5a | 10.0 | 0.015 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.329 |
Day 2 | 13.5b | 5.3b | 37.8a | 9.3 | 0.005 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.253 |
Day 3 | 9.6b | 5.1b | 35.4a | 7.0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.081 |
Day 4 | 6.9b | 6.0b | 35.8a | 5.8 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.052 |
Days 1–4 | 11.2by | 6.5by | 37.1a | 4.0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.003 |
Period 2 | ||||||||
Day 1 | 29.2a | 10.9b | 37.6a | 6.5 | 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.084 |
Day 2 | 20.3ab | 7.2b | 32.1a | 6.9 | 0.006 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.040 |
Day 3 | 20.9ab | 8.0b | 29.9a | 6.6 | 0.010 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.011 |
Day 4 | 17.0ab | 8.8b | 25.9a | 6.6 | 0.052 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.009 |
Days 1–4 | 21.8bx | 8.7cy | 31.4a | 3.3 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Period 3 | ||||||||
Day 1 | 12.4b | 19.7b | 40.1a | 8.6 | 0.011 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.313 |
Day 2 | 13.2b | 12.5b | 37.9a | 6.4 | 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.146 |
Day 3 | 17.8b | 13.5b | 36.4a | 7.8 | 0.016 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.146 |
Day 4 | 17.8b | 14.7b | 43.1a | 7.6 | 0.002 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.418 |
Days 1–4 | 15.3by | 15.1bx | 39.4a | 3.7 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.012 |
Overall | ||||||||
Day 1 | 18.8b | 13.4b | 39.1a | 4.9 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.032 |
Day 2 | 15.7b | 8.3b | 35.9a | 4.3 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.006 |
Day 3 | 16.1b | 8.9b | 33.9a | 4.1 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
Day 4 | 13.9b | 9.8b | 34.9a | 4.0 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.001 |
Days 1–4 | 16.1b | 10.1c | 36.0a | 2.1 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
a–cWithin a row, means without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
x,yWithin a column, means for days 1–4 of each period without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
*Diets were offered in a paired choice as mash in two feeders with four feeding spaces each. Each pig had access to 0.5 feeding space if all pigs were eating simultaneously.
†Feed preference of a test diet was expressed as percentage of sum of feed intake of test diet and its reference diet.
‡A value < 50 means that pigs preferred the reference diet. The lower the value, the stronger the preference for the reference diet over the test diet. Preference of the reference diet (= 100 – Feed preference of test diet) was not shown.
||Least-squares means based on nine pen observations of eight pigs per double-choice comparison.
$For feed preference, an effect of paired diet comparison (P < 0.001) and interaction between paired diet comparison and period (P = 0.007) were observed.