Table 7.
Paired diets, test diet [reference diet]‡ | P-value$ | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Feed preference,† % | 1. B. napus CM [SBM] | 2. B. juncea CM [SBM] | 3. B. juncea CM [B. napus CM] | SEM|| | Among pairs | Pair 1 | Pair 2 | Pair 3 |
Period 1 | ||||||||
Day 1 | 35.0 | 22.7 | 33.5 | 15.2 | 0.679 | 0.178 | 0.016 | 0.201 |
Day 2 | 29.9 | 10.5 | 16.4 | 10.8 | 0.200 | 0.022 | < 0.001 | 0.007 |
Day 3 | 36.0 | 14.6 | 19.6 | 10.5 | 0.117 | 0.101 | < 0.001 | 0.003 |
Day 4 | 29.4 | 9.6 | 23.9 | 10.1 | 0.144 | 0.007 | < 0.001 | 0.024 |
Days 1–4 | 32.6ax | 14.3bxy | 23.4ab | 5.5 | 0.005 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Period 2 | ||||||||
Day 1 | 11.3 | 23.9 | 18.6 | 10.6 | 0.503 | < 0.001 | 0.020 | 0.002 |
Day 2 | 14.3 | 12.1 | 21.5 | 9.7 | 0.597 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.007 |
Day 3 | 11.2 | 6.2 | 14.9 | 5.9 | 0.354 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Day 4 | 15.5 | 4.9 | 18.6 | 6.6 | 0.108 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Days 1–4 | 13.1y | 11.8y | 18.4 | 3.9 | 0.204 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Period 3 | ||||||||
Day 1 | 11.1 | 24.3 | 21.7 | 9.5 | 0.347 | < 0.001 | 0.004 | 0.009 |
Day 2 | 17.5 | 20.4 | 9.6 | 6.8 | 0.276 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Day 3 | 7.0 | 19.0 | 19.0 | 7.7 | 0.211 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Day 4 | 11.4ab | 22.2a | 5.5b | 6.0 | 0.029 | < 0.001 | 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Days 1–4 | 11.8by | 21.5ax | 14.0ab | 3.5 | 0.016 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Overall | ||||||||
Day 1 | 19.1 | 23.6 | 24.6 | 7.0 | 0.706 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Day 2 | 20.6 | 14.3 | 15.9 | 5.3 | 0.478 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Day 3 | 18.1 | 13.3 | 17.8 | 5.0 | 0.556 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Day 4 | 18.7 | 12.2 | 16.0 | 4.7 | 0.383 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
Days 1–4 | 19.1 | 15.8 | 18.6 | 2.6 | 0.413 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 |
a,bWithin a row, means without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
x,yWithin a column, means for days 1–4 of each period without a common superscript differ (P < 0.05).
*Diets were offered in a paired choice as pellets in two feeders with four feeding spaces each. Each pig had access to one feeding space if all pigs were eating simultaneously.
†Feed preference of a test diet was expressed as percentage of sum of feed intake of test diet and its reference diet.
‡A value < 50 means that pigs preferred the reference diet. The lower the value, the stronger the preference for the reference diet over the test diet. Preference of reference diet (= 100 – Feed preference of test diet) was not shown.
||Least-squares means based on 12 pen observations of 4 pigs per paired comparison.
$For feed preference, effects of paired diet comparison and day were not observed (P = 0.413), but an effect of period and interaction between paired diet comparison and period were observed (P < 0.01).