Skip to main content
. 2018 Feb 8;96(1):17–26. doi: 10.1093/jas/skx024

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Effect of Six1 promoter (AC)n microsatellite variations on its expression. The pigs with three main types of genotypes (AC)19/19 (n = 23), (AC)19/22 (n = 26), and (AC)22/22 (n = 25) were selected from the P×D×L×Y commercial pig population and real-time PCR was conducted to detect the expression of Six1. The relative expression levels were calculated using comparative Ct (△△Ct) value method and HPRT was used as reference. Data were shown as the mean ± SD. One-way analysis of variance was used in SPSS 20.0 and Bonferroni method was used for multiple testing. P-values were shown in scatter plot. ns, no significant difference.