Table 4.
Effect of diet characteristics on energy balance of growing pigs
Item | Dietary treatment1 | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Basal | FFRB | DFRB | CGF | CGM | SEM | P-value | |
Energy balance2, kcal·kg BW0.6−1·d−1 | |||||||
ME intake | 544a | 537ab | 518b | 514b | 515b | 6 | 0.003 |
THP | 286c | 288bc | 311a | 307ab | 307ab | 5 | 0.003 |
Adjusted THP | 277b | 282b | 315a | 313a | 312a | 6 | <0.001 |
FHP3 | 182 | 189 | 188 | 193 | 186 | 5 | 0.529 |
RE4, kcal·kg BW0.6−1·d−1 | |||||||
REP | 103ab | 94ab | 96ab | 109a | 91b | 5 | 0.044 |
REL | 156a | 156a | 113b | 97.3b | 118b | 7 | <0.001 |
Total | 259a | 250a | 209b | 207b | 209b | 5 | <0.001 |
Adjusted REP | 98ab | 91b | 98ab | 111a | 93b | 5 | 0.040 |
Adjusted REL | 152a | 154a | 114bc | 101c | 120b | 8 | <0.001 |
Adjusted total | 250a | 245a | 212b | 213b | 213b | 4 | <0.001 |
RQ | |||||||
Fed state | 1.07 | 1.05 | 1.08 | 1.07 | 1.06 | 0.01 | 0.183 |
Fasted state3 | 0.82 | 0.83 | 0.80 | 0.84 | 0.80 | 0.01 | 0.103 |
Energy utilization, % | |||||||
NE/ME | 80.9ab | 81.8a | 76.7c | 78.1bc | 76.9c | 1.1 | 0.001 |
Energy values, kcal/kg DM | |||||||
DE | 3,947a | 3,805ab | 3,284d | 3,520c | 3,709b | 47 | <0.001 |
ME | 3,843a | 3,725a | 3,191c | 3,414b | 3,549b | 40 | <0.001 |
NE15 | 3,110a | 3,047a | 2,450c | 2,669b | 2,729b | 42 | <0.001 |
NE25 | 3,065 | 2,978 | 2,390 | 2,575 | 2,677 | – | – |
Predicted NE5 | 2,857 | 2,792 | 2,297 | 2,464 | 2,586 | – | – |
a–dMeans within a row with different superscripts differ (P < 0.05).
1Basal = corn–soybean meal basal diet; FFRB = full-fat rice bran diet; DFRB = defatted rice bran diet; CGF = corn gluten feed diet; CGM = corn germ meal diet.
2THP = total heat production; FHP = fasting heat production; adjusted THP means the THP was adjusted for an ME intake of 528 kcal·kg BW0.60−1·d−1 (mean value for the experiment) by covariance.
3FHP was calculated using the equation for THP with gas concentrations and air flow obtained from only the last 8-h heat production measurement from days 19 to 20 (i.e., from 22:30 to 06:30 h). To base production using the same time span as used for THP, the 8-h heat production was extrapolated to a 24-h period. Similarly, the RQ in fasted state was calculated as the ratio between CO2 production and O2 consumption (which was extrapolated to a 24-h period).
4RE = retained energy; REP = retained energy as protein (kcal·kg BW0.6−1·d−1) = [nitrogen intake (g) − nitrogen in feces (g) − nitrogen in urine (g)] × 6.25 × 5.70 (kcal/g)/BW0.6; REL = retained energy as lipids (kcal·kg BW0.6−1·d−1) = [RE (kcal) − retained energy as protein (kcal)]/BW0.6. Adjusted REP, REL, and RE means the REP, REL, and RE was adjusted for an ME intake of 528 kcal·kg BW0.60−1·d−1 (mean value for the experiment) by covariance, respectively.
5NE1 or NE2 (kcal/kg DM) = [RE (kcal/d) + FHP (kcal/d)]/DMI (kg/d), where FHP was from individual FHP measured in this experiment and FHP of Noblet et al. (1994; FHP = 179 kcal·kg BW0.6−1·d−1), respectively; predicted NE (kcal/kg DM) = 0.700 × DE (kcal/kg DM) + [(1.61 × ether extract (%) + 0.48 × starch (%) − 0.91 × CP (%) − 0.87 × ADF (%)] × 10.