Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Dec 25.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Med. 2018 Jun 25;24(7):1070–1080. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0061-3

Figure 1. Flowchart showing approach used for the integration of clinical, molecular phenomics and metagenomic information and biological validations.

Figure 1

a, Confounder and modifier analysis performed using linear models on the FLORINASH clinical markers identified three confounders: age, BMI and country (n = 105). Subsequent analyses were performed using partial Spearman’s rank-based correlation (pSRC) coefficients adjusted for age, BMI and country and corrected for multiple testing using the Benjamini and Hochberg criterion (p-FDR). b, Metagenome-wide and phenome-wide association of taxonomic abundance data with clinical markers (n = 56 patients, pSRC, p-FDR < 0.05). c, Network analysis of hepatic transcriptome (n = 56 patients, pSRC, p-FDR < 0.05). d, Metabolome-Wide Association Study based on plasma (n = 56) and urine (n = 102, pSRC, p-FDR < 0.05) 1H-NMR spectra. e, In vitro and in vivo pre-clinical validation protocols. f, Integrative comparison analysis using Rv coefficients (n = 56). g, Predictive performance of an O-PLS-DA model integrating all metagenomic and phenomic modalities for prediction of non-alcoholic fatty liver (no hepatic steatosis, score = 0, n = 10 vs. steatosis, score > 0, n = 46) in ROC curves. All tests are two-sided.