Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Sep 17.
Published in final edited form as: Am Econ J Econ Policy. 2018 Aug;10(3):122–153. doi: 10.1257/pol.20160355

Table 6.

Relationship between co-insurance and elasticity

Sample Dependent Variable: Co-insurance rate
All drugs & plans (1) All drugs & plans (2) High frequency drugs (3) All drugs & plans (4) “Lower subst.” drugs (5) Branded drugs (6) Generic drugs (7)
Panel A. Drug-level analysis
Estimated demand elasticity −0.283 (0.044) −0.284 (0.044) −0.336 (0.081) −0.236 (0.037) −0.315 (0.098) −0.264 (0.032) −0.619 (0.075)
Plan fixed effects No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Drug price included No No No Yes No No No
R-squared 0.083 0.342 0.37 0.426 0.493 0.303 0.518
No. of Obs. (plan years) 654,270 654,270 521,358 654,270 139,965 277,684 376,586
Mean of Dep. Var. 0.435 0.435 0.441 0.435 0.485 0.400 0.462
Std. Dev. Of Dep. Var. 0.306 0.306 0.304 0.306 0.339 0.266 0.33
Panel B. Class-level analysis
Estimated demand elasticity −0.308 (0.064) −0.310 (0.065) −0.316 (0.074) −0.256 (0.053)
Plan fixed effects No Yes Yes Yes
Drug price included No No No Yes
R-squared 0.030 0.305 0.34 0.387
No. of Obs. (plan years) 587,050 587,050 463,507 587,050
Mean od Dep. Var. 0.408 0.408 0.416 0.408
Std. Dev. Of Dep. Var. 0.267 0.267 0.267 0.267

Table shows the relationship between a drug’s (Panel A) or class’ (Panel B) pre-gap co-insurance rate and its estimated elasticity. The unit of observation is a drug (or class) by plan. Standard errors in parentheses are clustered at the drug (or class) levels.