Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Aug 30;104(4):619–637. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1192

Table 2.

Clinical Trials Evaluating Effects of Stimulants on Academic Outcomes in Children with Coexisting ADHD and Reading Disorder

Source and Study Design Sample Size of Children with ADHD+LD and Characteristics Duration and Dose of Medication Treatment Efficacy Measures Findings Comments Oxford Quality Rating
Bental B et al (2008)
Controlled clinical trialb with DBPC crossover methodology
-N=25 had ADHD+RD
-7-11 years old
-100% male, race not specified
-RD criteria: <25th percentile in both NDB single word decoding and text reading subtests, or <15th percentile on either one
-Trial with single MPH dose
-MPH dose was 0.3-0.4 mg/kg
-Word and non-word decoding accuracy (NDB)
-Spelling (NDB)
-Phonemic synthesis and deletion (NDB)
-MPH improved word and non-word decoding accuracy but not spelling accuracy, phonemic synthesis, or phonemic deletion. -No correction for multiple comparisons 1b-
Dykman RA et al (1991)
Cohort analytica
-N=82 had ADHD+RD
-7-11 years old
-Analyzed sample was 100% male and Caucasian
-RD criteria: IQ≥90 AND WRAT reading and spelling subtest SS <90
-4 week trial
-Treatment with low MPH dose (0.3mg/kg BID) and high MPH dose (0.6mg/kg BID)
-20-minute arithmetic task with addition and subtraction problems -MPH improved arithmetic performance. -Data on MPH effects analyzed for only 78% (N=64) of the ADHD+RD group 2b
Hechtman L et al (2005)
Randomized controlled trial
-N=82 had ADHD+RD at study baseline (N=576 for whole sample)
-7-9 years old
-Whole sample: 80% male, 61% Caucasian
-RD criteria: discrepancy between IQ and WIAT reading SS at the 5% significance level
-14 month trial
-Children randomized to get rigorously titrated MPH (mean=38 mg/kg/day), combined MPH (mean=31 mg/kg/day), + behavior parent training, behavior parent training only, or usual community care (67% got ADHD medications: among those on MPH, mean=23 mg/kg/day)
-Meeting criteria for reading disorder (discrepancy between ability and reading achievement at the 5% significance level, as measured by the WISC-III and WIAT) -Among those with LD at baseline, there was a borderline significant decrease in likelihood of meeting criteria for LD at the end of the trial in: 1) the MPH group compared to the community care group, 2) in the combined (MPH + behavior parent training) group compared to the community care group, 3) the behavioral parent training group compared to the community care group. -Data was from the Multimodal Treatment Study of Children with ADHD (landmark trial of MPH efficacy in pediatric ADHD) 1b
Keulers EH et al (2007)
Cohort analytica
-N=24 had ADHD+RD (N=9 had ADHD-only)
-7-13 years old
-71% male, race not specified
-RD criteria: met DSM-IV criteria for RD and not improving in reading skills despite adequate remedial instruction for at least 6 months
-Study duration varied between 0.3 to 1.4 years
-Mean MPH dose was 0.48 mg/kg/day
-Word reading/decoding (EMT and DMT)
-Non-word decoding (Klepel Test)
-MPH produced larger improvements in word decoding and non-word decoding skills in the ADHD+RD than the ADHD-only group. -Duration between pre- and post-assessments varied from 0.3 to 1.4 years
-Limited description of inclusion criteria and MPH dosing protocol
2b
Tamm L et al (2017)
Controlled clinical trialb
-N=78 had ADHD+RD
-Grades 2-5
-68% male and 71% African American
-RD criteria: IQ≥70 AND SS <90 on WJIII Letter Word Identification subtest, Word Attack subtest, or Basic Reading Skills composite.
-16 week trial
-Ultimate/final medications prescribed were MPH for 46%, AMPH and/or DEX for 42%, ATX for 4%, and guanfacine for 6% (mean doses not reported)
-Word Reading and Pseudoword Decoding (WIAT-3) -Word reading and pseudoword decoding skills improved more with a reading intervention than with medication treatment. -Families also attended an average of 4.8 behavior training sessions in addition to child receiving ADHD medication 1b-
Tannock R et al (2018)
Controlled clinical trialb with DBPC methodology
-N=65 had ADHD+RD
-Ages 7-11 years old
-75% male and 90% Caucasian
-RD criteria: IQ>80 AND SS on ≥2 reading subtests [WRAT-3 Reading, WRMT-R Word Identification, WRMT-R Word Attack] at least 1.5 SD below age level or SS on all 3 reading subtests at least 1 SD below age level
-4 month trial
-Maximum MPH dose was 0.7mg/kg BID or 20mg BID (whichever achieved first), mean dose not specified
-Speech-sound discrimination (GFW Sound Analysis subtest)
-Word attack and word identification (WRMT-R)
-Word decoding (KT and TOT
-Passage comprehension (WRMT-R)
-Arithmetic (WRMT-R)
-MPH improved speech-sound discrimination and arithmetic performance, but not word attack, word identification, decoding, or passage comprehension. -Children with a history of poor response to stimulant medications excluded 2bc
Williamson D et al (2014)
Controlled clinical trialb with DBPC crossover methodology
-N=46 had ADHD+LD (N=31 had RD, N=9 had MD, N=6 had RD+MD)
-9-12 years old
-69% male and 40% minority (African American or Hispanic)
-RD criteria: scores 1-2 SD below the mean on the CTOPP Elision subtest and the GORT-4 fluency subtest
-MD criteria: scores 1-2 SD below the mean on the WIAT-II-A Numerical Operations subtest
-6 week trial
-MPH was titrated upward until clinician rated children as “much” or “very much” improved: best dose was 18mg for 13%, 36mg for 26%, and 54mg for 61% of ADHD+LD group
-Handwriting (THS-R)
-Math computation (PERMP)
-Reading Fluency (DIBELS)
-Reading Comprehension (GSRT)
-MPH improved reading fluency, handwriting, and math computation skills, and had borderline significant beneficial effects on reading comprehension. -No correction for multiple comparisons
-Children with a history of stimulant non-response excluded
2bc
a

Naturalistic, open label study, with pre- and post-measures

b

Described as randomized by authors but classified as a controlled clinical trial rather than a randomized control trial due to lack of detail regarding randomization procedures

c

Quality rating downgraded from 1b due to exclusion of children with history of poor response to stimulants

ADHD=attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder

AMPH=Amphetamine

ATX=Atomoxetine

DBPC=Double-blind placebo-controlled

DEX=Dextroamphetamine

DIBELS=Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills

DMT=Three Minutes Test

DSM-IV=Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-4th edition

EMT=One Minute Test

GFW=Goldman-Fristoe-Woodcock

GORT-4=Gray Oral Reading Test-4th edition

GSRT – Gray Silent Reading Test

KT=Keyword Test

LD=Learning Disorder

MD=Math Disorder

MPH=Methylphenidate

NDB=Nitzan Diagnostic Battery for Reading Performance in Hebrew

PB=Placebo

PERMP – Permanent Product Math Test

RD=Reading disorder

SS=Standard score

THRS-R=Test of Handwriting Skills-Revised

TOT=Test of Transfer

WIAT=Wechsler Individual Achievement Test

WISC=Weschler Intelligence Scale for Children

WJIII=Woodcock Johnson III Tests of Achievement

WRAT=Wide Range Achievement Test

WRMT-R=Woodcock Reading Mastery Tests-Revised