Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;9:3785. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-06194-1

Table 2.

Kinetic constants for ExoS and ExoT ADP-ribosyltransferase domain activity

Target KMεNAD (μM) KMtarget (μM) kcat (min−1) kcat/KM (μM−1 s−1)
ART domains
 ExoS233–453 a 28.6 ± 6.6 n.a.b 9.9 ± 0.72 5.7 × 10−3
 ExoS233–453 K-Ras 49.0 ± 9.1 32.2 ± 9.9 7.9 ± 0.5 2.7 × 10−3
 ExoS233–453 Rac3 41.7 ± 9.3 11.4 ± 4.6 11.2 ± 0.8 4.5 × 10−3
 ExoS233–453 Rnd1 39.9 ± 18.1 4.8 ± 1.9 7.9 ± 1.0 3.3 × 10−3
 ExoS233–453 Agmatine 133 ± 14 2760 ± 130 53.5 ± 2.2 6.7 × 10−3
 ExoT235–457 Crk 8.2 ± 1.9 16.9 ± 2.6 2.1 ± 0.10 4.3 × 10−3
 ExoT235–457 Agmatine 44.4 ± 5.8 660 ± 160 0.24 ± 0.01 0.1 × 10−3
C-terminal deletions
 ExoS233–435 a 61.2 ± 8.9 n.a. 7.2 ± 0.4 1.9 × 10−3
 ExoS233–435 K-Ras 37.2 ± 2.2 17.0 ± 3.1 11.7 ± 0.22 5.3 × 10−3
 ExoS233–419 c a 88.5 ± 11.1 n.a. n.d.d n.d.
 ExoS233–419 c K-Ras 96.9 ± 18.1 36.1 ± 15.7 n.d. n.d.
ExoS-Vis chimaera
 SxVis a 378 ± 81 n.a. 0.10 ± 0.01 4.4 × 105
 SxVis K-Ras 114 ± 19 e n.d. 0.42 ± 0.03 6.1 × 10−5

Calculated from ADP-ribosyltransferase activities using 14-3-3β as a cofactor (except ExoS-Vis chimaera), εNAD+ as a co-substrate, and the indicated substrates (at a concentration near their KM) as an acceptor for the modification Rate data (n = 2) were converted to concentrations of εNAD+ by calibration with εAMP, and fitted to the Michaelis equation. Means ± standard errors are reported

aGlycohydrolase activity/automodification

bNot applicable

cCo-expressed with 14-3-3β

dNot determined

eIn the presence of 30 μM K-Ras