Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 17;3:15. doi: 10.1038/s41536-018-0041-8

Table 1.

Summary of included studies

Author Subject population KL grade Treatment Donor Outcomes Follow-up Funding
Single-arm, prospective follow-up studies
Bui 201420 (Vietnam) N = 21 II–III SVF injection + PRP Auto Lysholm score, VAS pain, MRI 1, 3, 6 M X
Centeno 2008a21 (Unites states) N = 1 (age: 36 y; M) BD-MSC injection (4.56 × 107 cells) Auto VAS pain, MRI (cartilage and meniscus volumes) 1, 3 M
Centeno 2008b22 (Unites states) N = 1 (46 y; M) BD-MSC injection (2.24 × 107 cells) Auto VAS pain, functional rating index, ROM, MRI evaluation (cartilage and meniscus volumes) 1, 3, 6 M
Davatchi 201123 (Iran) N = 4 (age: 57.8 ± 5.0 y; 50% F) II–III BD-MSC injection (8–9 × 106 cells) Auto VAS pain, ROM 6 M X
Davatchi 201624 (Iran) N = 4 (age: 57.8 ± 5.0 y; 50% F) II–III BD-MSC injection (8–9 × 106 cells) Auto VAS pain, ROM 60 M X
Emadedin 201225 (Iran) N = 6 (age: 53.8 ± 8.9 y; 100% F) IV BD-MSC injection (2.0–2.4 × 107 cells) Auto VAS pain, WOMAC, ROM, MRI evaluation 2 W; 1, 2, 6, 12 M X
Emadedin 201526 (Iran) N = 6 (age: 53.8 ± 8.9 y; 100% F) IV BD-MSC injection (2.0–2.4 × 107 cells) Auto VAS pain, WOMAC, MRI evaluation 2, 6, 12, 30 M X
Fodor 201627 (Unites states) N = 6 patients 8 knees (age: 59.0 ± 7.3 y; 83.3% F) I (N = 2) II (N = 2) III (N = 4) SVF injection Auto VAS pain, WOMAC, ROM, TUG, MRI evaluation 3, 12 M X
Kim 2015c28 (Korea) N = 49 patients, 55 knees (age: 58.1 ± 8.9 y; 52.7% F) I–II AD-MSC implantation (4.3 × 106 cells) + AD Auto IKDC, Tegner activity scale 26.7 M
Kim 201629 (Korea) N = 20 patients, 24 knees (age: 57.9 ± 5.9 y; 45.0% F) I–II AD-MSC implantation (4.4 × 106 cells) + AD Auto IKDC, Tegner activity scale, MRI evaluation (MOCART and MOAKS) 27.9 M
Koh 201332 (Korea) N = 18 (age: 54.6 ± 7.8 y; 66.7% F) III–IV AD-MSC injection (1.18 × 106 cells) + PRP Auto WOMAC, Lysholm score, VAS pain, MRI evaluation (WORMS) 24.3 M
Koh 2014a30 (Korea) N = 35 patients, 37 knees (age: 57.4 ± 5.7 y; 60.0% F) I–II AD-MSC implantation (3.8 × 106 cells) + AD Auto IKDC, Tegner activity scale, arthroscopic evaluation (ICRS grade) 26.5 M
Koh 201531 (Korea) N = 30 (age: 70.3 [65–80] y; 83.3% F) II–III AD-SVF (4.2 × 107 cells) injection + PRP + AD Auto Lysholm, KOOS, VAS pain, K/L grade, arthroscopic evaluation 3, 12, 24 M
Michalek 201533 (Czech Republic) N = 1114 (age: 62.0 [19–94] y; 47.8% F) II–IV AD-SVF injection (1.6 × 106 cells) + PRP Auto Modified KOOS, X-ray, MRI evaluation 17.2 M X
Orozco 201334 (Spain) N = 12 (age: 49.0 ± 17.3 y; 50.0% F) II (N = 4) III (N = 3) IV (N = 5) BD-MSC injection (4.0 × 107 cells) Auto VAS pain, Lequesne index, WOMAC, PCI, SF-36 3, 6, 12 M
Orozco 201435 (Spain) N = 12 (age: 49.0 ± 17.3 y: 50.0% F) II–IV BD-MSC injection (4.0 × 107 cells) Auto VAS pain score, Lequesne index, WOMAC, PCI 3, 6, 12, 24 M
Pak 201136 (Korea) N = 2 (age: 74.5 ± 6.4 y; 100% F) AD-MSC injection + HA + PRP + CaCl2 + dexamethasone Auto VAS pain, ROM, MRI evaluation 3 M
Sampson 201637 (Unites states) N = 125 (age: 57.0 [23–79] y; 100% F) III–IV BMC injection + PRP Auto VAS, global patients satisfaction survey 4.8 M
Soler Rich 201539 (Spain) N = 50 (age: 57.8 ± 14.1 y; 40.0%F) II–IV BD-MSC injectio (4.0 × 107 cells) Auto VAS, Lequesne score, WOMAC, MRI evaluation T2 mapping, PCI) 0, 6, 12 M
Soler 201638 (Spain) N = 15 (age: 51.1 ± 10.3 y; 60.0% F) II (N = 9) III (N = 6) BD-MSC injection (4.1 × 107 cells) Auto VAS, Lequesne score, WOMAC, SF-36, MRI evaluation (T2 mapping) 1 W; 3, 6, 12, 48 M X
Trajune 201340 (Thailand) N = 5 (age: 57.2 ± 1.92 y; 80.0% F) II AAPBSC injection + GFAP concentrate + HA + MCS Auto WOMAC, KOOS 1, 6 M X
Quasi-experimental studies
Centeno 201441 (Unites states) I: N = 518 (age 54.3 ± 14.1 y) C: N = 163 (age 59.9 ± 10.3 y) I: I (N = 223) II (N = 145) III/IV (N = 102) C: I (N = 69) II (N = 58) III/IV (N = 39) I: BMC injection + PRP with adipose fat graft C: BMC injection + PRP Auto Improvement rating scale, LEFS, NPS 1, 3, 6, 12 M
Jo 201442 (Korea) I-a: Low dose, N = 3 (age: 63.0 ± 8.6 y; 66.7% F) I-b: Mid dose, N = 3 (age: 65.0 ± 6.6 y; 100% F) I-c: High dose, N = 12 (age: 61.0 ± 6.2 y; 83.3% F) I-a: III (N = 2) IV (N = 1) I-b: III (N = 2) IV (N = 1) I-c: III (N = 8) IV (N = 4) AD-MSC injection (I-a: 1.0 × 107, I-b: 5.0 × 107, I-c: 1.0 × 108 cells) Auto WOMAC, VAS pain, KSS, MRI evaluation (defect size and cartilage volume), arthroscopic evaluation (defect size and ICRS grade), biopsy 1, 2, 3, 6 M X
Kim 2015a43 (Korea) I: N = 17 patients, 17 knees (age: 57.7 ± 5.8 y; 52.9% F) C: N = 37 patients, 39 knees (age: 57.5 ± 5.9 y; 62.2% F) I–II I: AD-MSC implantation with fibrin glue (3.9 × 106 cells) + AD C: AD-MSC implantation (3.9 × 106 cells) + AD Auto IKDC, Tegner activity scale, arthroscopic evaluation (ICRS grade) 28.6 M
Kim 2015b44 (Korea) I: N = 20 (age: 59.1 ± 3.5 y; 65.0% F) C: N = 20 (age: 59.4 ± 3.1 y; 65.0% F) I–II I: AD-MSC implantation (4.0 × 106 cells) + AD C: AD-MSC injection (4.0 × 106 cells) + PRP Auto IKDC, Tegner activity scale, arthroscopic evaluation (ICRS grade) 28.6 M
Koh 201245 (Korea) I: N = 25 (age: 54.2 ± 9.3 y; 68.0% F) C: N = 25 (age: 54.4 ± 11.3 y; 68.0% F) I: 3.3 ± 0.8 C: 2.7 ± 0.7 I: AD-MSC injection (1.89 × 106 cells) + PRP C: PRP Auto Lysholm, Tegner activity scale, VAS pain 3, 16.4 M
Nguyen 201746 (Vietnam) I: N = 15 (age: 58.6 ± 6.5 y; 80.0% F) C: N = 15 (age: 58.2 ± 5.7 y; 80.0% F) I: II (N = 4) III/IV (N = 11) C: II (N = 5) III/IV (N = 10) I: AD-SVF injection (1.89 × 106 cells) + AM + PRP C: AM + PRP Auto WOMAC, modified VAS pain, Lysholm, MRI 1, 6, 12, 18 M X
Pers 20166 (France) I-a: Low dose, N = 6 (age: 63.2 ± 4.1 y; 50.0% F) I-b: Mid dose, N = 6 (age: 65.5 ± 8.1 y; 50.0% F) I-c: High dose, N = 6 (age: 65.2 ± 2.3 y; 66.7% F) I-a: III (N = 2) IV (N = 41) I-b III (N = 1) IV (N = 5) I-c III (N = 0) IV (N = 6) AD-SVF injection (I-a: 2 × 106, I-b: 10 × 106, I-c: 50 × 106 cells) Auto WOMAC, Global knee pain, PGA, KOOS, SAS, SF-36, MRI evaluation 1 W; 3, 6 M X
Randomized controlled trials
Gupta 201647 (India) Cohort 1: I-a (Low dose): N = 10 (age: 58.1 ± 8.2 y; 70.0% F) I-b (Mid dose): N = 10 (age: 57.3 ± 9.5 y; 80.0% F) C-a: N = 10 (age: 54.9 ± 8.3 y; 100.0% F) Cohort 2: I-c (High dose): N = 10 (age: 55.0 ± 6.7 y; 80.0% F) I-d (Very high dose): N = 10 (age: 54.0 ± 6.7 y; 50.0% F) C-b: N = 10 (age: 56.7 ± 5.2 y; 70.0% F) I-a: II (N = 4) III (N = 6) I-b: II (N = 1) III (N = 9) C-a: II (N = 3) III (N = 7) I-c: II (N = 1) III (N = 9) I-d: II (N = 3) III (N = 7) C-b: II (N = 2) III (N = 8) I: BD-MSC injection (I-a: 25 × 106, I-b: 50 × 106, I-c: 75 × 106 cells, I-d: 150 × 106 cells) + HA C: HA Allo VAS, WOMAC, ICOAP, X-ray, MRI (WORMS) 12 M X
Koh 2014b48 (Korea) I: N = 21 (age: 54.2 ± 2.9 y; 76.2% F) C: N = 23 (age: 52.3 ± 4.9 y; 73.9% F) I: II (N = 0) III (N = 9) IV (N = 12) C: II (N = 1) III (N = 11) IV (N = 11) I: HTO + AD-MSC implantation + PRP C: HTO + PRP Auto Lysholm, KOOS, VAS pain, FTA, arthroscopic evaluation (Kanamiya grade) 24.4 M
Lamo-Espinosa 20165 (Spain) I-a (Low dose): N = 10 (age: 65.9 [IQR: 59.5, 70.6] y; 60.0% F) I-b (High dose): N = 10 (age: 57.8 [IQR: 55.0, 60.8] y; 20.0% F) C: N = 10 (age: 60.3 [IQR: 55.1, 61.1] y; 30.0% F) I-a: II (N = 1) III (N = 2) IV (N = 7) I-b: II (N = 3) III (N = 3) IV (N = 4) C: II (N = 4) III (N = 2) IV (N = 4) I: BD-MSC injection (Low dose: 1 × 107 cells; High dose: 1 × 108 cells) + HA C: HA Auto VAS, WOMAC, ROM, X-ray, MRI (WORMS) 3, 6, 12 M X
Varma 201049 (India) I: N = 25 (age: 50.7 ± 5.4 y) C: N = 25 (age: 48.2 ± 5.1 y) I: BMC injection + AD C: AD Auto VAS pain, OAOS 1, 2, 3, 6 M
Vega 201550 (Spain) I: N = 15 (age: 56.6 ± 9.6 y; 60.0% F) C: N = 23 (age: 57.3 ± 9.4 y; 66.7% F) I: II (N = 6) III (N = 6) IV (N = 3) C: II (N = 7) III (N = 5) IV (N = 3) I: BD-MSC injection (4.0 × 107 cells) C: HA Allo VAS pain, WOMAC, Lequesne algofunctional indices, SF-12, MRI evaluation (T2 mapping, PCI) 1 W; 3, 6, 12 M
Wakitani 200251 (Japan) N = 24 (I: N = 12; C: N = 12) (age: 63.0 [49–70] y; 62.5% F) I: HTO + BD-MSC implantation (1.0 × 107 cells) C: HTO + cell free collagen gel-sheet implantation Auto Hospital for special surgery knee-rating scale, arthroscopic and histological assessment 16 M
Wong 201352 (Singapore) I: N = 28 (age: 53.0 [36–54] y; 54.0% F) C: N = 28 (age: 49.0 [24–54] y; 50.0% F) I: HTO + BD-MSC implantation (1.5 × 107 cells) C: HTO Auto IKDC, Lysholm, Tegner activity scale, MRI evaluation (MOCART) 6, 12, 24 M

AAPBSC autologous activated peripheral blood stem cells, AD arthroscopic debridement, AD-MSC adipose tissue derived mesenchymal stem (stromal) cells, AD-SVF adipose tissue derived stromal vascular fraction, AM arthroscopic microfracture, BD-MSC bone marrow derived mesenchymal stem (stromal) cell, BMC bone marrow concentrate, FTA femorotibial angle, GFAP growth factor addition/preservation, HA hyaluronic acid, HTO high tibial osteotomy, ICOAP intermittent and constant osteoarthritis pain, ICRS international cartilage repair society, IKDC international knee documentation committee, IQR interquartile range, K/L grade Kellgren/Lawrence grade, KOOS knee osteoarthritis outcome score, KSS knee society score, LEFS lower extremity functional questionnaire, MCS microdrilling mesenchymal cell stimulation, MOAKS MRI osteoarthritis knee score, MOCART magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue, MRI magnetic resonance image, NPS numeric pain scale, OAOS osteoarthritis outcome score, PCI poor cartilage index, PGA patient global assessment, PRP platelet-rich plasma, ROM range of motion, SAS short arthritis assessment scale, SF-12 short form-12 health survey, SF-36 short form-36 health survey, SVF stromal vascular fraction, TUG timed up and go, VAS visual analog scale, WOMAC Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, WORMS whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score. X indicates presence of funding.