Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 11;9:1047. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01047

Table 2.

Equations of the final lamina width (cm) response to increased plant densities for different cultivars.

PP 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18
C1 a −0.12 −0.15 −0.17 −0.18 −0.12 −0.14 −0.18 −0.23 −0.18
b 10.12 10.48 10.56 10.24 9.2102 8.6364 8.5123 8.3687 7.1836
R2 0.76 0.74 0.75 0.73 0.73 0.72 0.68 0.81 0.72
C2 a −0.191 −0.172 −0.157 −0.208 −0.225 −0.254 −0.197 −0.152
b 11.009 10.658 10.105 10.271 9.8834 9.5964 8.6302 7.4411
R2 0.73 0.69 0.74 0.80 0.85 0.93 0.78 0.97
C3 a −0.179 −0.211 −0.233 −0.252 −0.251 −0.299 −0.264 −0.210 −0.238
b 10.089 10.64 10.8 10.595 9.7349 9.9759 9.1595 7.8331 7.526
R2 0.91 0.93 0.95 0.92 0.60 0.85 0.80 0.83 0.76

Here C1 Zhengdan 958, C2 Longping 206, C3 Jinqiu 119, PP ranks. R2 is statistically significant (P < 0.05).