Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep;128(3):485–491. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.04.018

Supplementary Fig. 3.

Supplementary Fig. 3

DW-MRI and ADC maps of two patients (#06 and #09) acquired with RT and diagnostic scan setups, respectively. A–D: DW-MRI with b = 150 s/mm2 with RT and diagnostic setup of patient #06 (A, B) and patient #09 (C, D), respectively. E–F: DW-MRI with b = 800 s/mm2 with RT and diagnostic setup of patient #06 (E, F) and #09 (G, H). I–L: Similarly, ADC maps are presented for patient #06 (I, J) and #09 (K, L). PET-derived ROIs are shown for patient #06 (green, orange) and patient #09 (blue) to estimate the difference in ADC. A mean difference in SNR between both scan setups of −24.1% and −16.6% was found for b150 and b800 images for patient #06 (good correspondence). Similarly, a difference of −29.3% and −29.6% was found for patient #09 (average correspondence). The mean difference in ADC was 7.8% and 0.7% for green and orange ROI (good correspondence) and 14% for blue ROI (average correspondence) for patient #06 and #09, respectively.