Skip to main content
. 2016 Dec 2;2016(1):316–322. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2016.1.316

Table 2.

Results in response-adapted studies of reduced therapy in PET-negative groups

Trial name Reference Stage No. of PET-negative patients No. of cycles and type of initial therapy % Interim PET negative 5-Point PET score (if used) No. of cycles and type of post-PET therapy Time to analysis (y) PFS (%) OS (%)
NCRI RAPID 1 IA-IIA nonbulky 420 3 ABVD 75 1-2 Nil vs IFRT 5 90.8 vs 94.6 99 vs 97.1
EORTC HD10 25 I-II 1
Favorable risk 381 2 ABVD 86 1 ABVD + INRT vs 2 ABVD 100 vs 94.9
Unfavorable risk 519 75 2 ABVD + INRT vs 4 ABVD 97.3 vs 94.7
RATHL 2 II with adverse features, III, IV 935 2 ABVD 84 1-3 4 ABVD 3 85.7 97.2
4 AVD 84.4 97.6
GITIL/FIL 0607 26 II with adverse features, III, IV 195 2 ABVD 80 1-3 4 ABVD + IFRT 2 94
4 ABVD 88
GHSG HD15 27 IIBX, III, IV 548 6-8 BEACOPPescalated
or 8 BEACOPP-14
74 (of partial responses) No IFRT for PET negative 4 92.6 95
LYSA AHL2011 28 IIB, III, IV 688 2 BEACOPPescalated 88 4 BEACOPPescalated 2 94
4 ABVD 92

AVD, same as ABVD without bleomycin.