Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 8;2017(1):28–36. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2017.1.28

Table 2.

Summary of CAR-T trials in acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Study center Patients treated (n) Median age (range) No. salvage therapies Lymphodepleting chemotherapy CAR-T cell dose Costimulatory domain Responses: CR, no. of patients attaining MRD negativity
MSKCC55-57 44 45 (22-74) 1-3 (median 1), 4 relapsed after allo Cy first study, then Flu/Cy 1 × 106/kg vs 3 × 106/kg CD28 (19-28z) CR: 37/45 (30/36 MRD-negative) 6 mo OS: 65%
FHCRC58 29 40 (20-73) 1-11 (median 3) Cy then Flu/Cy 2 × 105/kg vs 2 × 106/kg vs 2 × 107/kg 4-1BB CR 10/12 in CY group, 14/14 in Flu/Cy group, (23/27 MRD-negative)
CHOP53,59 53 14 (5-60) 1-4, 3 with primary refractory disease Investigators choice 1.07 × 106 to 17.36 × 106 4-1BB CR 50/53 (45/50 MRD-negative) 12 mo OS 78%
NCI54 20 14 (5-27) 1-8 (median 2), 7 with primary refractory disease Flu/Cy 1 × 106/kg vs 3 × 106/kg CD28 CR 14/20 (12/14 MRD-negative) 7.8 mo OS 52%

Cy, cyclphosphamide; Flu, fludarabine.