Skip to main content
. 2018 Jun 6;97(10):3736–3745. doi: 10.3382/ps/pey215

Table 1.

Coefficient of variation for BW (BW CV) at various ages of hens fed with a precision feeding station toward a High and Standard BW1 curve and photostimulated (PS) at wk 18 or 21.

–––––––––––––––––––– BW CV (%) ––––––––––––––––––––––
BW PS Week 4 Week 7 Week 14 Week 18 Week 21 Week 27 Week 40 Week 54 Pooled SEM
Wk2 5.7x 2.4y,z 0.3z 0.4z 0.9y,z 2.8x-z 3.5x,y 3.7x,y 1.0
BW × wk High 7.9a 2.1 0.3 0.4a 0.9 4.4a 5.4a 6.0a 1.1
Standard 3.4b 2.6 0.4 0.4a 0.8 1.3b 1.6b 1.3b
PS × wk 18 7.1 2.1 0.4 0.5 0.7 3.0 3.0 4.0 1.3
21 4.2 2.7 0.3 0.3 1.0 2.7 4.0 3.3
BW × PS × wk High 18 11.0a 1.8 0.4 0.5 1.0 4.6 5.5a 7.5a 1.6
21 4.9b 2.5 0.2 0.3 0.8 4.1 5.4a,b 4.6a,b
Standard 18 3.3b 2.3 0.3 0.5 0.4 1.3 0.5b 0.5b
21 3.6b 2.8 0.4 0.4 1.2 1.2 2.6a,b 2.0b

a,bLSMeans within a column and treatment group lacking a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05).

x–zLSMeans within a row lacking a common superscript differ (P ≤ 0.05).

1Hens followed either the breeder-recommended BW curve (Standard) or an accelerated BW curve reaching the 21 wk BW at 18 wk (High).

2 P-values for the different sources of variation were as follows: wk, P = 0.012; BW, P < 0.001; PS, P = 0.686; BW × PS, P = 0.044; week × BW, P = 0.014; week × PS P = 0.895; week × BW × PS, P = 0.448.