Skip to main content
. 2018 Jul 27;28(10):765–773. doi: 10.1093/glycob/cwy061

Table I.

Relative abundances of ethyl esterified glycans compared to HPCE-LIF analyzed APTS derived glycansa

Ethyl esterified N-glycansa Mean (±SD) Mean (±SD) Relative proportiona APTS derived N-glycansb
H5N4E1 3.8 (0.28) 3.8 (0.28) 9.2 A2S1
H5N4F1L1 1.0 (0.06) 1.3 (0.09) 2.0 A2S1F
H5N4F1E1 0.3 (0.03)
H5N4E1L1 4.7 (0.16) 79.5 (0.10) 67.4 A2S2
H5N4E2 74.8 (0.26)
H5N4F1L2 2.3 (0.06) 4.7 (0.03) 8.9 A2S2F
H5N4F1E1L1 1.4 (0.02)
H5N4F1E2 1.0 (0.01)
H6N5E2L1 4.2 (0.15) 7.0 (0.18) 3.9 A3S3
H6N5E3 2.8 (0.04)
H6N5F1E2L1 2.0 (0.07) 2.0 (0.07) 4.0 A3S3F
H3N3E1 0.3 (0.03) 1.6 (0.14) 4.6 Other
H4N3E1 0.4 (0.06)
H6N5E1 0.8 (0.13)
H6N5E1 0.1 (0.02)

“H” represents hexose, “N” N-acetyl hexosamine, “F” fucose, “E” ethylated N-acetyl neuraminic acid and finally “L” represents lactonized N-acetyl neuraminic acid. aReiding et al. (2014); bFenaille et al. (2007).