Skip to main content
. 2018 May 3;4(8):e180163. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.0163

Table 2. Kaplan-Meier Estimates and Multivariable Survival Models.

CTC-RT Group Kaplan-Meier Estimate, All Patients AFT Multivariable Analysis
All Patients Matched Cohorts
No. of Patients (No. of Events) RMS (95% CI), moa Survival Proportion, % (95% CI)b Log-Rank P Value TR (95% CI) P Valuec TR (95% CI) P Valuec
NCDB Cohortd
CTC-positive, no RT 172 (18) 78.6 (74.2-83.0) 88.0 (82.3-94.2) .005 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA
CTC-positive, RT 227 (7) 85.5 (83.3-87.6) 94.9 (90.8-99.1) 2.34 (1.26-4.35) .006 1.65 (1.26-2.17) <.001
CTC-negative, no RT 563 (34) 82.3 (80.1-84.4) 93.4 (91.1-95.9) 1.93 (1.13-3.30) .02 1.90 (1.46-2.48) <.001
CTC-negative, RT 735 (33) 82.9 (79.5-86.3) 93.9 (91.7-96.1) 1.72 (1.07-2.74) .02 1.59 (1.23-2.07) <.001
SUCCESS Cohorte
DFSf
CTC-positive, no RT 46 (8) 73.7 (62.9-84.4) 75.2 (61.5-91.9) .002 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA
CTC-positive, RT 248 (35) 81.1 (78.0-84.2) 88.0 (83.9-92.4) 3.77 (1.77-8.03) <.001 2.83 (2.02-3.98) <.001
CTC-negative, no RT 216 (23) 82.0 (78.4-85.7) 88.3 (83.5-93.4) 3.28 (1.51-7.12) .002 2.16 (1.41-3.33) <.001
CTC-negative, RT 1006 (87) 84.9 (83.6-86.3) 92.3 (90.5-94.0) 5.05 (2.47-10.33) <.001 3.61 (2.58-5.03) <.001
LRFSg
CTC-positive, no RT 46 (4) 82.8 (74.1-91.5) 85.7 (73.6-99.8) .003 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA
CTC-positive, RT 248 (7) 90.3 (88.8-91.8) 98.2 (96.4-100.0) 3.59 (1.45-8.94) .005 4.35 (2.60-7.28) <.001
CTC-negative, no RT 216 (7) 89.8 (88.0-91.6) 96.2 (93.3-99.2) 2.65 (1.11-6.36) .03 2.12 (1.21-3.72) .008
CTC-negative, RT 1006 (23) 90.1 (89.2-91.1) 98.1 (97.3-99.0) 4.31 (1.88-9.86) <.001 5.99 (3.36-10.70) <.001
OSh
CTC-positive, no RT 46 (5) 81.5 (73.2-89.9) 84.5 (72.7-98.2) .008 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA
CTC-positive, RT 248 (20) 86.8 (84.8-88.9) 92.4 (88.9-95.9) 2.73 (1.16-6.41) .02 2.05 (1.41-2.97) <.001
CTC-negative, no RT 216 (11) 87.4 (84.9-89.9) 95.2 (92.0-98.5) 2.92 (1.22-6.99) .02 1.99 (1.21-3.30) .007
CTC-negative, RT 1006 (41) 88.9 (88.0-89.8) 96.7 (95.6-97.9) 4.04 (1.80-9.08) <.001 2.89 (1.96-4.25) <.001
Pooled Cohort
BCSi
CTC-positive, no RT 49 (9) 73.6 (63.7-83.5) 73.3 (59.4-90.3) <.001 1 [Reference] 1 [Reference]
CTC-positive, RT 411 (20) 87.2 (85.6-88.8) 93.6 (90.8-96.6) 3.42 (1.47-8.00) .004 3.42 (2.17-5.40) <.001
CTC-negative, no RT 163 (8) 86.0 (82.7-89.3) 92.7 (87.3-98.3) 3.10 (1.33-7.24) .009 2.82 (1.65-4.81) <.001
CTC-negative, RT 1554 (64) 87.8 (87.0-88.6) 95.5 (94.3-96.6) 3.70 (1.69-8.09) <.001 3.41 (2.21-5.28) <.001
Mastectomyj
CTC-positive, no RT 169 (14) 82.6 (78.7-86.5) 84.3 (76.0-93.6) .30 1 [Reference] NA 1 [Reference] NA
CTC-positive, RT 64 (7) 82.0 (76.1-87.9) 88.3 (79.9-97.6) 0.90 (0.51-1.58) .64 0.96 (0.70-1.31) .78
CTC-negative, no RT 616 (37) 84.0 (81.8-86.2) 91.0 (87.8-94.2) 1.34 (0.94-1.92) .17 1.38 (1.14-1.68) .001
CTC-negative, RT 187 (10) 85.1 (82.1-88.1) 95.8 (92.6-99.2) 1.30 (0.80-2.11) .29 1.66 (1.16-2.37) .006

Abbreviations: AFT, accelerated time failure; BCS, breast-conserving surgery; CTC, circulating tumor cell; DFS, disease-free survival; LRFS, local recurrence-free survival; NCDB, National Cancer Database; NA, not applicable; OS, overall survival; RMS, restricted mean survival; RT, radiotherapy; SUCCESS, Simultaneous Study of Gemcitabine-Docetaxel Combination Adjuvant Treatment as well as Extended Bisphosphonate and Surveillance; TR, time ratio.

a

Measured as overall survival in the NCDB and pooled cohorts.

b

Measured as 4-year survival in the NCDB cohort and 5-year survival in the SUCCESS and pooled cohorts.

c

Determined by Wald test.

d

For pairwise interaction terms of CTC status and RT in the AFT multivariable analyses, P = .01 for all patients (n = 1697) and P < .001 for matched cohorts (n = 1197).

e

For AFT multivariable analysis, includes 1516 for all patients and 1176 for matched cohorts.

f

For pairwise interaction terms of CTC status and RT in the AFT multivariable analysis, P = .04 for all patients and P = .04 for matched cohorts.

g

For pairwise interaction terms of CTC status and RT in the AFT multivariable analysis, P = .13 for all patients and P = .20 for matched cohorts.

h

For pairwise interaction terms of CTC status and RT in the AFT multivariable analysis, P = .16 for all patients and P = .23 for matched cohorts.

i

For pairwise interaction terms of CTC status and RT in the AFT multivariable analysis, P = .04 for all patients (n = 2177) and P < .001 for matched cohorts (n = 1840).

j

For pairwise interaction terms of CTC status and RT in the AFT multivariable analysis, P = .82 for all patients (n = 1036) and P = .83 for matched cohorts (n = 932).