Skip to main content
. 2012 Feb 27;119(21):5030–5036. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-11-389304

Figure 2.

Figure 2

Effect of CD4 iNKT cells on MLR. (A) αGC-expanded, highly purified CD4 iNKT cells from a normal donor (R86) were placed in MLR comprising autologous CD3+ T cells (responders; R) against allogeneic irradiated PBMC (stimulators; S) at iNKT/R/S ratio of 10:1:1 and compared with R/S (baseline) and autologous (self) MLR. Cell proliferation was measured by 3H-thymidine incorporation 96 hours later. Bars represent means and error bars represent SEMs of triplicate assays. (B) In a series of MLRs involving 8 different responders, each placed against a panel of 3-4 allogeneic stimulators, the addition of autologous CD4 iNKT cells resulted in a 59% ± 8% (P = .0048; 1 sample z test) decrease in proliferation compared with baseline MLR. (C) IFN-γ secretion was significantly decreased on the addition of CD4 iNKT cells to the baseline MLR of R86 against the same panel of stimulators as in panel A. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of triplicate assays. (D) Dose-dependent inhibition of the MLR by CD4 iNKT cells. Responder 75 (R75) CD4 NKT cells were added in MLR at different iNKT/R ratios as shown. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of triplicate assays. (E) Contact-dependent inhibition of the MLR by CD4 iNKT cells. MLRs of R75 versus 2 stimulators were set up in a transwell coculture system as shown at the bottom and described in “Methods.” Contact of CD4 NKT cells with the responder and stimulator cells suppressed the MLR; when CD4 iNKT cells were separated from the MLR by the transwell membrane, cell proliferation was almost completely restored to the levels of the baseline MLR. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of triplicate assays. (F) CD4 iNKT cells are cytotoxic against allogeneic myeloid DCs. CD4 iNKT cells were cytotoxic against allogeneic DCs in a Cr51 release assay at the iNKT/DC ratios of 1:1 and 10:1, an effect that was abrogated by the Ca2+ chelator EGTA. Data are shown as mean ± SEM of triplicate assays. See also supplemental Figure 6.