Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep;239:15–20. doi: 10.1016/j.tvjl.2018.07.009

Fig. 1.

Fig. 1

Fitted Gaussian probability density functions of eight participants, before and after a review of the evidence on treatments for footrot. Positive responses favoured ‘injection and spray’ over ‘trim and spray’. Values for the fitted hyperparameters (mean and standard deviation) are shown in Table 3. The published literature currently supports a difference in cure rates of approximately 60%.