Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 18;9:3711. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05739-8

Table 3.

The agents’ observations and conclusions

Agent Assumed observation Statement inferred via (Q) Further implied statement Statement inferred via (C)
F¯ r=tailsattimen:01 StatementF¯n:02: “I am certain that W will observe w = fail at time n:31.”
F z=+12 at time n:11. StatementFn:12: “I am certain that F¯ knows that r = tails at time n:01.” StatementFn:13: “I am certain that F¯ is certain that W will observe w = fail at time n:31.” StatementFn:14: “I am certain that W will observe w = fail at time n:31.”
W¯ w¯=ok¯ at time n:21 StatementW¯n:22: “I am certain that F knows that z=+12 at time n:11.” StatementW¯n:23: “I am certain that F is certain that W will observe w = fail at time n:31.” StatementW¯n:24: “I am certain that W will observe w = fail at time n:31.”
W announcement by agent W¯ that w¯=ok¯ at time n:21 StatementWn:26: “I am certain that W¯ knows that w¯=ok¯ at time n:21” StatementWn:27: “I am certain that W¯ is certain that I will observe w = fail at time n:31.” StatementWn:28: “I am certain that I will observe w = fail at time n:31.”

The statements that the individual agents can derive from quantum theory depend on the information accessible to them (cf. Fig. 2). Agent F¯, for instance, if she observes r = tails, can use this information to infer w, which will later be observed and announced by W