Table 2. Multiple linear regression analysis of the association between eGFR and serum endostatin.
Variable | Beta | P-value | F | Adjusted R2 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model 1 | Mean carotid IMT (mm) | 0.05 | 0.166 | 27.5 | 0.224 |
Log-transformed serum endostatin (ng/mL) | −0.24 | < 0.001 | |||
Model 2 | Mean carotid IMT (mm) | 0.04 | 0.340 | 10.1 | 0.237 |
Log-transformed serum endostatin (ng/mL) | −0.20 | < 0.001 | |||
Model 3 | Mean carotid IMT (mm) | 0.04 | 0.272 | 24.0 | 0.221 |
Log-transformed serum endostatin (ng/mL) | −0.26 | < 0.001 |
Beta coefficient and P-value were calculated by multiple linear regression.
Model 1: Adjusted for significant risk factors found in the univariate analysis (age, current smoking, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and uric acid).
Model 2: Adjusted for the known covariates sex, body mass index, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and triglycerides in addition to the adjustments made for model 1.
Model 3: Adjusted for the covariates age, sex, HbA1c, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and uric acid selected by stepwise method from significant parameters with serum endostatin level in Table 1.
eGFR: estimated glomerular filtration rate, IMT: intima-media thickness, HbA1c: hemoglobin A1c