Table 4:
Association between service characteristics and socio-demographic characteristics
| Good services provided | Readily available drugs | Near | Affordable services | Prompt attention | Polite Workers | X p-value* | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | n (%) | |
|
| |||||||
| Gender | |||||||
| Male | 41(37.4) | 13 (12.1) | 20 (18.7) | 15(14.0) | 14 (13.1) | 5(4.7) | 0.75 |
| Female | 33(41.8) | 12 (15.2) | 14 (17.7) | 12(15.2) | 7(8.9) | 1(1.3) | |
| Level of Education | |||||||
| Basic | 7 (13.0) | 16 (29.6) | 12 (22.2) | 18(33.3) | 1(1.9) | 0(0.0) | <0.001 |
| Tertiary | 66 (50.0) | 9(6.8) | 22 (16.7) | 9(6.8) | 20 (15.2) | 6(4.5) | |
| Marital Status | |||||||
| Single | 5 (20.8) | 1(4.2) | 6(25.0) | 7(29.2) | 5(20.8) | 0(0.0) | 0.06 |
| Married | 67 (42.1) | 24 (15.1) | 27 (17.0) | 19(11.9) | 16 (10.1) | 6(3.8) | |
| Separated/Divorced | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(100.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | |
| Widowed | 1(50.0) | 0(0.0) | 1(50.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | 0(0.0) | |
| Grade Level | <0.01 | ||||||
| Junior Staff | 2(4.9) | 10(24.4) | 11(26.8) | 16(39.0) | 2 (4.9) | 0(0.0) | |
| Mid-level Staff | 47(44.3) | 15(14.2) | 20(18.9) | 10(9.4) | 12 11.3) | 2(1.9) | |
| Senior Staff | 21(61.5) | 0 (0.0) | 3(7.7) | 1(2.6) | 7(17.9) | 4 10.3) | |
| Age Group | <0.01 | ||||||
| 29 and less | 4(25.0) | 0(0.0) | 3(18.8) | 5(31.2) | 4(25.0) | 0(0.0) | |
| 30-39 | 15(30.6) | 5(10.2) | 13(26.5) | 8(16.3) | 8(16.3) | 0(0.0) | |
| 40-49 | 25(41.0) | 13(21.3) | 13(21.3) | 5(8.2) | 4(6.6) | 1(1.6) | |
| >50 | 29(48.3) | 7(11.7) | 5(8.3) | 9(15.0) | 5(8.3) | 5(8.3) | |
| Occurrence of CHE | <0.01 | ||||||
| Yes | 6(14.6) | 8(19.5) | 10(24.4) | 15(36.6) | 2(4.9) | 0(0.0) | |
| No | 67(47.2) | 17(11.7) | 24(16.6) | 12(8.3) | 19(13.1) | 6(4.1) | |
*
Fishers Exact Test