Table 4.
Results of the Executive Review Committee end‐of‐study survey on the VOR experience
| Experience of the VOR process (n = 12) | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Moderate/High, % | Low/No, % | ||
| Prior knowledge of VOR | 0 | 100 | |
| Postknowledge of VOR | 67 | 33 | |
| Confidence in interpreting VOR | 75 | 25 | |
| (Somewhat) agree, % | Neither agree nor disagree, % | (Somewhat) disagree, % | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The team addressed my input before incorporating VOR | 27 | 46 | 27 |
| Training in VOR was sufficient | 67 | 25 | 8 |
| VOR material provided to EC was easy to understand | 67 | 16 | 17 |
| VOR material provided to EC was appropriate in length | 91 | 9 | 0 |
| The VOR proposal evaluation aided my decision making | 50 | 42 | 8 |
| The VOR materials helped the evaluation process | 50 | 42 | 8 |
| The VOR materials hindered the evaluation process | 8 | 42 | 50 |
| I support adding VOR to the proposal evaluation process | 42 | 41 | 17 |
The results of the Executive Review Committee end‐of‐study survey. The questionnaire is provided in the Supplementary materials. The questions used a Likert scale.